The Fubini-Study metric $g:=g_{FS}$ is the unique $U(n+1)$-invariant Riemannian metric on the complex projective space $\mathbb{CP}^{n}$ the complex projective space which by $U(n+1)$-invariance can be wlog definined on tangent bundle over affine chart $ U_0 :=\{Z \in \mathbb{CP}^n \ \vert z_0 \neq 0 \} \subset \mathbb{CP}^n $ and then it extends uniquely by $U(n+1)$-action to all affine pieces $U_i$.
So we can restict our considerations to tangent space $T_Z \mathbb{CP}^n$ over a point
$$Z =[1:z_1:....z_n] \in U_0 :=\{Z \in \mathbb{CP}^n \ \vert z_0 \neq 0 \} \subset \mathbb{CP}^n$$
Let $\{\partial _{1},\ldots ,\partial _{n}\}$ the be frame of tangent space
$T_Z \mathbb{CP}^n$ at $Z$, ie the canonical $\mathbb{C}$-basis of
$T_Z \mathbb{CP}^n$. Then the Fubini Study metric is defined by
$$\tag{FS} g_{i{\bar {j}}}=h(\partial _{i},{\bar {\partial }}_{j})= {\frac {(1+|\mathbf {z} |^{2})\delta _{i{\bar {j}}}- {\bar {z}}_{i}z_{j}}{(1+|\mathbf {z} |^{2})^{2}}} $$
At first glance one can think that $g$ somehow "has hallen from heaven" but it is well knows that it's not. One way to derive it is using Kähler potentials and canonical choice of a distinguished connection: Chern connection: See Here the excellent answer by Arctic Char.
The concern of this question is to find out if it also possible to derive $g$ on $\mathbb{CP}^{n}$ naturally by recognizing $(\mathbb{CP}^{n},g)$ as Riemannian submersion of $(\mathbb{C}^{n+1} \backslash \{0\},h)$ where $h$ is to restriction of standard Hermitian metric on $\mathbb{C}^{n+1}$ to $\mathbb{C}^{n+1} \backslash \{0\}$.
What do I mean by 'naturally"?
Well, $\mathbb{CP}^{n}$ can be considered as submersion of complex manifold $\mathbb{C}^{n+1} \backslash \{0\}$ via canonical projection
$$\pi: \mathbb{C}^{n+1} \backslash \{0\} \to \mathbb{CP}^n$$
The complex manifold is moreover Hermitian since $ \mathbb{C}^{n+1} \backslash \{0\}$ inherits naturally the standard Hermitian metric $h$ on $ \mathbb{C}^{n+1} $. Futhermore by $\pi$ the $\mathbb{CP}^{n}$ can also be considered as quotient $ \mathbb{C}^{n+1} \backslash \{0\} / \mathbb{C}^*$.
By definition a Riemannian submersion $F: (M,g_M) \to (N, g_N)$ is a submersion from one Riemannian manifold $M$ with Riemannian metric $g^M$ to another Riemannian manifold $N$ with Riemannian metric $g^N$ that respects the metrics, meaning that it is an orthogonal projection on tangent spaces.
Namely that means that for every $x \in M$ and $y=F(X)$ the restriction of the differential map $dF_x$ to $ker(dF_x)^{\perp} \subset T_x M $ gives an isometry $d_x F: ker(dF_x)^{\perp} \to T_y N$ such that the metric $g^N$ is induced by $g^M$ is following sense:
Let $A, B \in T_y N$ and denote by $\overline{A}, \overline{B} \in ker(dF_x)^{\perp}$ their unique preimages with respect the isometry $d_x F: ker(dF_x)^{\perp} \to T_y N$.
Then
$$\tag{RieSub} g^N _y(A,B)= g^M _x(\overline{A}, \overline{B})$$
QUESTION:
How can be proved that the Fubini-Study metric $g$ arises exactly on this way? ie that the canonical projection
$\pi: \mathbb{C}^{n+1} \backslash \{0\} \to \mathbb{CP}^n$
extends naturally to Riemannian submersion $\pi: (\mathbb{C}^{n+1} \backslash \{0\},h) \to (\mathbb{CP}^n, g)$
is the sense above, where $h$ is the restriction of the stadard Hermitian metric on $\mathbb{C}^{n+1}$ and $g$ is the Fubini- Study metric defined above in (FS).
In other words we need to verify that the metrics $h$ and $g$ are related to each other as in (RieSub).
Take as $y= Z =[1:z_1:....z_n]$ and $x =(1,z_1,..., z_n) \in \mathbb{C}^{n+1}$ and $\partial _{i}, \partial _{j} \in T_y \mathbb{CP}^n$ element of the canonical basis of the tangent space at $y$. Firstly we need an explicit identification between the tangent space $T \mathbb{CP}^n$ and $ker(d \pi)^{\perp}$. We need this isometry explicitly since in order to prove (FS) we have to work with unique preimages of elements in $T_y \mathbb{CP}^n$ living in $ker(d \pi_x)^{\perp}$.
But I don't see how can I show that indeed
$$g(\partial _{i},{\bar {\partial }}_{j})= {\frac {(1+|\mathbf {z} |^{2})\delta _{i{\bar {j}}}- {\bar {z}}_{i}z_{j}}{(1+|\mathbf {z} |^{2})^{2}}} $$
holds. On the left side we have already identified $\partial _{i}, \partial _{j} \in T_y \mathbb{CP}^n$ with their unique preimages in $ker(d_x \pi)^{\perp}$.