The page "mapping class groups" on wikipedia says the topological MCG of T^n is GL(n,Z), but does anyone know a reference? Also, is the smooth MCG of T^n known?
4
-
$\begingroup$ If you were to take the mapping class group to be $\pi_0 HomotopyEquiv(M)$, i.e. the path-components of the homotopy equivalences of the manifold $M$, then provided $M$ is a $K(\pi,1)$, the mapping class group would be $Out(\pi_1 M)$. So provided $\pi_1 M$ is abelian, this is just $Aut(\pi_1 M)$. $\endgroup$– Ryan BudneyCommented Aug 18, 2010 at 0:01
-
$\begingroup$ I'm using $MCG(M)$ in the sense of either $\pi_0 Homeo(M)$ or $\pi_0 Diff(M)$, but probably it's your version that is meant by claim on wikipedia. $\endgroup$– Yi LiuCommented Aug 18, 2010 at 0:11
-
$\begingroup$ I patched-up the Wikipedia page a little. Still could use work. Thanks Gogolev and Liu. $\endgroup$– Ryan BudneyCommented Aug 18, 2010 at 1:10
-
$\begingroup$ For $n=3$ this result is due to Hatcher: dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-9383(76)90027-6 $\endgroup$– Ian AgolCommented Aug 18, 2010 at 20:45
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
4
- Indeed, $MCG(\mathbb T^n)=GL(n,\mathbb Z)$ in dimension $n<4$, but it is not simple. In dimension 2 it was first proved by Earle and Eells using complex analysis.[Edit: As Allen Hatcher points out this was known for a long time, Earle and Eells prove much stronger statement: $\mathbb T^2$ is deformation retraction of $Diff_0(\mathbb T^2)$]
- I am not sure what happens in dimension 4.
- This is not correct in dimension >4, the MCG is semidirect product of $GL(n,\mathbb Z)$ with another (non-finitely generated group). Let me just quote Hatcher:
If $n\ge 5$ then there are split exact sequences $$ 0\to \mathbb Z_2^\infty\to\pi_0(Top(\mathbb T^n))\to GL(n,\mathbb Z)\to 0 $$ $$ 0\to \mathbb Z_2^\infty\oplus\binom n2\mathbb Z_2\to\pi_0(PL(\mathbb T^n))\to GL(n,\mathbb Z)\to 0 $$ $$ 0\to \mathbb Z_2^\infty\oplus\binom n2\mathbb Z_2\oplus\sum_{i=0}^n\binom n i\Gamma_{i+1}\to\pi_0(Diff(\mathbb T^n))\to GL(n,\mathbb Z)\to 0 $$ where $\Gamma_i$ are Kervaire-Milnor finite abelian groups of homotopy spheres, $\mathbb Z_2$ is just the group of order 2 and $\mathbb Z_2^\infty$ is the group of finite strings.
The above quote is from Hatcher "Concordance spaces, higher simple homotopy theory and application."
answered Aug 17, 2010 at 23:08
-
$\begingroup$ I doubt there's much known about $\pi_0 Diff( (S^1)^4 )$. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 17, 2010 at 23:56
-
4$\begingroup$ In dimension 2 the result is quite a bit older than the theorem of Earle and Eells, which determines the full homotopy type of the diffeomorphism group of a closed orientable surface, not just the mapping class group. The mapping class group of the 2-dimensional torus was known to people like Nielsen, Dehn, and Baer around 1930 or even before. A modern textbook reference is the upcoming book on mapping class groups by Farb and Margalit. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 18, 2010 at 1:49
-
$\begingroup$ Thanks for all the answers and comments! I'll also be happy to see any updates about the dim 4 case. BTW does Hatcher's paper imply any partial description in dim 4? $\endgroup$– Yi LiuCommented Aug 19, 2010 at 1:58
-
$\begingroup$ Hatcher's paper doesn't actually contain a full proof. I think nothing can be said about dimension 4. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 20, 2010 at 0:17