1
$\begingroup$

It is well-known that the (covering) dimension of countable union of compact spaces is the superium dimension of these spaces. I would like to understand certain uncountable union of compact spaces as follows. Let $b>a$. Let $\{X_r\}_{r\in [a,b]}$ be a family of compact spaces with index $r\in [a,b]$. Suppose that for each $r\in (a,b)$, for any $r_k\in [a,b]$ with $r_k\to r$ and $x_{r_k}\in X_{r_k}$, the limit points of $\{x_{r_k}\}_{k\in \mathbb{N}}$ belong to $X_r$. The question is what the covering dimension of $\cup_{r\in [a,b]}X_r$ is.

The trivial example is the product space $Y\times [a,b]$ and the dimension is then dim$(Y)+1$. I guess the dimension of $\cup_{r\in [a,b]}X_r$ is bounded above by $\sup_{r\in [a,b]} \dim X_r+1$. But I have no idea how to show it.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

There is no upper bound for dimension in this case.

Just consider any surjective continuous map $f:[0,1]\to [0,1]^\omega$ onto the Hilbert cube. Such a map exists since the Hilbert cube is a Peano continuum. Then for every $r\in[0,1]$ put $X_r=\{f(r)\}$. It is clear that $\dim(X_r)=0$ for all $r\in[0,1]$ but $\dim([0,1]^\omega)=\infty$. The continuity of $f$ implies that the family $(X_r)_{r\in[0,1]}$ has the continuity property you require.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! What about if addtionally assuming that $r\mapsto X_r$ is injective? $\endgroup$
    – user119197
    Commented Apr 9, 2020 at 9:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If the map $r\mapsto X_r$ is injective, then you can define an inverse map $X\to[0,1]$, which will be continuous and then apply the Theorem on dimension-lowering mappings (1.12.4 in the Engelking's book "Theory of Dimensions. Finite and Infinite"). This theorem says that for a cosed continuous map $f:X\to Y$ between separable metrizable spaces $\dim(X)\le \dim(Y)+\sup_{y\in Y}\dim f^{-1}(y)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9, 2020 at 9:35
0
$\begingroup$

If you don't mind the correspondence $r\mapsto X_r$ being non-measurable, then you can put $[a,b]$ in correspondence with any other uncountable set, including $[a,b]^n$, and thereby get a set of arbitrary dimension.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ In this case, does the property (in the last line of first paragraph) satisfy? $\endgroup$
    – user119197
    Commented Apr 8, 2020 at 11:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .