2
$\begingroup$

Let $\Pi$ be the set of odd prime numbers and let $\mathcal P(\Pi)$ be the Boolean algebra of subsets of $\Pi$.

For a number $x$ denote by $\Pi(x)$ the set of odd prime divisors of $x$.

Problem. Does each singleton $\{p\}\subset \Pi$ belong to the Boolean algebra generated by the family $\{\Pi(2^n-1):n\ge 2\}$ in $\mathcal P(\Pi)$?

We can also ask a stronger

Question. Is it true that for every odd prime number $p$ there exit numbers $n_1,\dots,n_k$ such that $\{p\}=\bigcap_{i=1}^k\Pi(2^{n_i}-1)$?


Added in Edit. The number $p=5$ mentioned in the answer of Ofir Gorodetsky gives a counterexamle to Question but not to Problem as $\{5\}=\Pi(2^4-1)\setminus\Pi(2^2-1)=\{3,5\}\setminus\{3\}$.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not likely. Consider p=5. (Assuming k bigger than 1, as commented above.) Gerhard "Likes Looking For Small Counterexamples" Paseman, 2019.12.06. $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2019 at 21:23
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ To respond to the edit, also not likely. Consider Zsigmondy primes. I suspect 23 and 89 are primitive prime factors (of 2^11 - 1), and provide another counterexample. Gerhard "Thank Goodness For Small Exponents" Paseman, 2019.12.06. $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2019 at 21:48
  • $\begingroup$ Further, I suspect that replacing (-1) in the title by (+c) for some integer c (maybe c different from 15) will also yield a pair different from (but like) 23,89. Gerhard "Can Make A Wild Conjecture" Paseman, 2019.12.06. $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2019 at 22:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Restatement of the Problem: for $p,p'\in\Pi$, write $p\sim p'$ if for every $n\ge 2$, $p$ divides $2^n-1$ iff $p'$ divides $2^n-1$. Is $\sim$ the discrete equivalence relation on $\Pi$? In turn, this can be restated as: is the function mapping an odd prime $p$ to the order of $2$ modulo $p$, injective? $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 7, 2019 at 4:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ... and the sequence of orders of 2 modulo primes is OEIS:A014664. It's indeed not injective, the first failure of injectivity are $(23,89)$ mapping to 11, which is the pair mentioned by Gerhard Paseman, then $(37,109)$ mapping to 36, then $(53,157)$ mapping to 52. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 7, 2019 at 4:58

4 Answers 4

3
$\begingroup$

$2^{11}-1=2047=23\cdot 89$ and neither prime divides a smaller such number. So $23 \mid 2^n-1$ exactly when $n=11m.$ Similarly $89 \mid 2^n-1$ exactly when $n=11m.$ So $\{23,89\}$ is in the Boolean Algebra but neither of its singleton subsets is.

Here is a list for $n \leq 33$ of the set of primes which divide $2^n-1$ but not any $2^m-1$ for $1 \lt m \lt n$. These sets (excluding $\{\}$) are the atoms of the Boolean Algebra:

$[2, \left\{ 3 \right\} ],[3, \left\{ 7 \right\} ],[4, \left\{ 5 \right\} ],[5, \left\{ 31 \right\} ],[6, \left\{ \right\} ],[7, \left\{ 127 \right\} ],[8, \left\{ 17 \right\} ],[9, \left\{ 73 \right\} ],[10, \left\{ 11 \right\} ],$

$[11, \left\{ 23,89 \right\} ],[ 12, \left\{ 13 \right\} ],[13, \left\{ 8191 \right\} ],[14, \left\{ 43 \right\} ],[15, \left\{ 151 \right\} ],[16, \left\{ 257 \right\} ],[ 17, \left\{ 131071 \right\} ],$$[18, \left\{ 19 \right\} ],[19, \left\{ 524287 \right\} ],[20, \left\{ 41 \right\} ],[21, \left\{ 337 \right\} ],[22, \left\{ 683 \right\} ],[23, \left\{ 47,178481 \right\} ],$

$[24, \left\{ 241 \right\} ],[25, \left\{ 601,1801 \right\} ],[26, \left\{ 2731 \right\} ],[27, \left\{ 262657 \right\} ],[28, \left\{ 29,113 \right\} ],$

$[29, \left\{ 233,1103,2089 \right\} ] ,[30, \left\{ 331 \right\} ],[31, \left\{ 2147483647 \right\} ],[32, \left\{ 65537 \right\} ],[33, \left\{ 599479 \right\} ]$

$\endgroup$
2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Umm, how come singleton 5 is in the B.A.? Gerhard "Needs A Little More Thinking" Paseman, 2019.12.06. $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2019 at 22:12
  • $\begingroup$ Good point. Corrected. $\endgroup$ Dec 8, 2019 at 10:52
7
$\begingroup$

No. The gcd (greatest common divisor) of $\{ 2^{n_i}-1\}_{i=1}^{k}$ can be seen to be $2^{\gcd(n_1,\ldots,n_k)}-1$, by an application of the Euclidean algorithm. If $p$ divides this expression, then $\gcd(n_1,\ldots,n_k)$ is divisible by the order of $2$ in the multiplicative group $(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^{\times}$. In general, $2^{\mathrm{ord}_p(2)}-1$ may have prime factors other than $p$.

For instance, if $p=5$ and $p$ divides all of $\{ 2^{n_i}-1\}_{i=1}^{k}$ then each $n_i$ is divisible by $\mathrm{ord}_p(2) = 4$, and so each $2^{n_i}-1$ is divisible by $2^4-1=15= 3 \times 5$.

In fact, the answer to your question is positive only for primes $p$ such that $p^k$ is of the form $2^q-1$ for some $k$, where $q$ is a prime. (For $k=1$ these are known as Mersenne primes.)

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ And we can show there aren't many such p (where p^k + 1 is a power of 2) for k greater than 1. Gerhard "Also Likes Limiting Counterexample Search" Paseman, 2019.12.06. $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2019 at 21:42
  • $\begingroup$ Right, by Mihăilescu's theorem for instance there aren't such p once k>1, thanks for the observation. $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2019 at 21:45
  • $\begingroup$ there is also an elementary argument for the base p=2. (I can post a hint if it does not occur to you.) Gerhard "Don't Forget The Simple Methods" Paseman, 2019.12.06 $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2019 at 21:52
6
$\begingroup$

For example, if $2^n-1$ is divisible by 43, then $n$ is divisible by 14 and therefore $2^n-1$ is divisible by 127. Thus 43 is a counterexample.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for so quick answer to my Question. What about the Problem? Is $\{43\}$ a Boolean combination of the sets $\Pi(2^n-1)$ (like $\{5\}$)? $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2019 at 21:37
  • $\begingroup$ I do not know about 43, but Gerhard is correct that 23 and 89 are 'twins' in this algebra. $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2019 at 22:03
  • $\begingroup$ {43} is the Boolean sum of {3),{127} and the prime divisor set of (2^14) - 1. $\endgroup$ Dec 8, 2019 at 13:46
0
$\begingroup$

This was already answered in comments, so I'm posting cw.

The Boolean subalgebra $A$ defined by the OP being generated by finite subsets, it is atomic. The atoms are precisely the (finite) fibers of the function $f$ mapping the odd prime $p$ to the order $f(p)$ of $2$ modulo $p$; it is given by OEIS:A014664.

And indeed $f$ is not injective, so $A$ does not include all singletons. For instance $f(23)=f(89)=11$ (it was mentioned in a comment by Gehrard Paseman).

Hence the problem (and hence the question) has a negative answer. However the question already has a simpler negative answer, as the singleton $\{5\}$ (which belongs) to the Boolean algebra $A$ is not in the smaller set of subsets defined in the question using only finite intersections, see Ofir's answer.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.