9
$\begingroup$

$B_m :=\{x \in \Bbb R^n : ||x|| \le m\}$ and $\mathscr{F}f$ denotes the $L^2$ fourier transform of an $f \in L^2(\Bbb R^n)$.

I am trying to show that

If $f \in L^2(\Bbb R^n)$ then $f(y)=\lim\limits_{m \to \infty} \int_{B_m} \mathscr{F}f(x)e^{2\pi ix.y} dx$ a.e.

$f \in L^2(\Bbb R^n) \implies \mathscr{F}f \in L^2(\Bbb R^n)$

Now define, $g_m(x)=\mathscr{F}f(x) \chi_{B_m}(x)$

Then $g_m \in L^1(\Bbb R^n) \cap L^2(\Bbb R^n)$ and $g_m \to \mathscr{F}f$ pointwise a.e.

Since, $g_m \in L^1(\Bbb R^n)$ take their Fourier inverse because for them I have the expression for Fourier inversion which should be handy.

So If I could show that the inverse Fourier transforms of $g_m$ converge to our $f$ pointwise a.e., we are through! How to prove this?

I also tried by Schwarz density kind of arguments but I am getting double sequences and too hard to handle!

$\endgroup$
7
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ As far as I know, this is an open problem. An internet search will give you a lot of extra information. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 23, 2019 at 18:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Schwartz, given name Laurent. $\endgroup$
    – Bazin
    Commented Nov 30, 2019 at 17:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ should not this be a.e.? $f(y)$ itself is not even well defined. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 20, 2020 at 11:26
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ @PieroD'Ancona: If I remember this correctly, then the (one-dimensional) Carleson theorem only gives us convergence in the multi-variable case if rectangles instead of balls are used. (This wouldn't be the first time balls are causing trouble here; $\chi_B$ as a Fourier multiplier is unbounded on $L^p$, $p\not= 2$.) $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 20, 2020 at 14:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Michael Renardy True, but (with small yet non-zero probability) someone may solve the problem just because they learn about it here. Or, if someone solves it and publishes the answer in a proper place, they, or someone else, may write here the reference. Aren't these expected and welcomed evolutions of a post? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 16, 2022 at 12:57

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Let me reformulate your question: you consider the Fourier multiplier $ L_m=\mathbf 1_{B_m}(D) $ defined by the formula $$ (\mathbf 1_{B_m}(D)f)(x)=\int e^{2iπ x\xi}\mathbf 1_{B_m}(\xi) \hat f(\xi) d\xi. $$ It is obvious that $\lim_{m\rightarrow+\infty}\mathbf 1_{B_m}(D)f=f$ in $L^2(\mathbb R^n)$. In fact since $f$ in $L^2$ is equivalent to $\hat f$ in $L^2$, you can check (for $f\in L^2$), $$ \Vert f-\mathbf 1_{B_m}(D)f\Vert^2_{L^2}=\int_{\vert \xi\vert\ge m}\vert\hat f(\xi) \vert^2 d\xi, $$ which goes to zero, thanks to the Lebesgue Dominated Convergence Theorem. You can also extract a subsequence converging a.e.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks but that doesn't quite prove the statement as your argument can only conclude that we get a subsequence of the balls $B_m$ so that we get pointwise convergence a.e. But my question wants the pointwise convergence to hold true for the original sequence! $\endgroup$
    – Brozovic
    Commented Jun 22, 2020 at 9:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .