2
$\begingroup$

Let $S\subseteq \mathbb D:=\{z\in \mathbb C:|z|<1\}$. Suppose that $\overline S$, the Euclidean closure of $S$ meets $\mathbb T=\{z\in\mathbb C:|z|=1\}$. A point $\xi=e^{i\theta}\in \overline S\cap \mathbb T$ is called a non-tangential boundary point, if there is a cone $$S_\alpha(\theta):=\{z\in \mathbb D: |\arg(1-e^{-i\theta}z)|<\alpha, \;{\rm Re}\,(e^{-i\theta}z)\geq 0\},$$ and a sequence $(z_n)$ in $S\cap S_\alpha$ such that $\lim z_n=\xi$. My question is, whether the set $S_{nt}$ of all non-tangential boundary points of $S$ is Lebesgue measurable in $\mathbb T$. I would be surprised if this were the case, but could not come up with a counter example. This is connected to the Brown-Shields-Zeller theorem.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Can you proofread the definition of the cone? How are $\xi$ and $\theta$ related ? The real part is of the right quantity? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 4:59
  • $\begingroup$ I have now given the definition of $\xi=e^{i\theta}$. $\endgroup$
    – ray
    Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 9:08

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

For given $\alpha$ the corresponding set of nontangential boundary points is a $G_{\delta}$ set, since the cone must contain points of $S$ in annuli arbitrarily close to the unit circle. Here $G_n$ consists of boundary points $\xi$ where the cone $S_\alpha(\theta)$ intersects $\{z: 1-1/n<|z|<1\} \cap S$. Thus the set of all non tangential boundary points is a $G_{\delta \sigma }$ set and in particular a Borel set.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please give us for fixed $\alpha$ the sets $G_n$ in the $G_\delta$ representation? $\endgroup$
    – ray
    Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 8:20
  • $\begingroup$ I am sorry, but I still don't see why this set $G_n$ you define should be open in $\mathbb T$? $\endgroup$
    – ray
    Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 14:18
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Since the cone intersected with annulus is open in the disk, if it contains a point z of S and you shift it slightly the shifted cone will still contain z. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 15:35
  • $\begingroup$ Okay; very nice $\endgroup$
    – ray
    Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 16:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .