2
$\begingroup$

Is there a singular holomorphic foliation $F$ of $\mathbb{C}P^2$ which does not admit a global transverse holomorphic curve? More precisely there is no an immersed holomorphic submanifold of $\mathbb{C}P^2$ which intersect all regular leaves, transversely? If there exist such an example $F$, does this foliation admit a smooth(but not necessarily holomorphic) global transverse submanifold (of real dimension 2)?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The answer to this question is negative. If we require the transversal surface to be an immersed holomorphic curve then the only foliation for which such a surface exists is the pencil of lines. This is proven the Claim below. I will consider more generally the second part of your question where we require the transversal surface to be smooth but not necessarily holomorphic.

I will produce examples of foliations that don't have such a smooth transversal surface at the end of this answer. And I guess in reality that the only foliation that possesses a transversal surface is the pencil of lines (though I can not prove it so far).

Note that each singular holomorphic foliation on $\mathbb CP^2$ defines a rank one subsheaf of $T\mathbb CP^2$ and its first Chern class is at most $1$. I claim the following statement concerning transversal pairs $(\cal F,S)$ where $S$ is smooth (but not necessarily holomorphic). The case when $S$ is holomorphic immersed is proven in the same way.

Claim. There exists at most two types of transversal pairs $(S,\cal F)$ with $S$ smooth.

1)The first type is when $\cal F$ is a pencil of lines and $S$ is a sphere of degree $1$.

2) The second type is when $S$ is a torus in $\mathbb CP^2$ of degree $0$. Let us first prove this claim, first giving a remark. In particular $S$ can not be holomorphic.

Remark. Is $S$ is transversal to $\cal F$, it is orientable. Moreover we can choose its orientation in such a way, that it intersects the leafs of $\cal F$ positively.

Proof of Claim. Let $\cal F$ be a singular holomorphic foliation and let $S$ be a surface transversal to $\cal F$. Let $L$ be the line sub-bundle of the restriction $T\mathbb CP^2$ to $S$ such that $L$ is tangent to $\cal F$ along $S$. Let us choose an orientation on $S$ so that the homology class of $S$ in $H_2(\mathbb CP^2)$ is $d\ge 0$. Note $S$ is orientable, because it is transversal to $\cal F$). Then since $\cal F$ is transversal to $S$, over $S$ $T\mathbb CP^2|_S$ splits into the sum $L\oplus TS$, so we have

$$3d=c_1(T\mathbb CP^2|_S)=c_1(L\oplus TS)=c_1(L)+2-2g=dc_1({\cal F})+2-2g\;\;\;\;(1)$$

$$d(3-c_1({\cal F}))=2(1-g).$$

Since $c_1({\cal F})\le 1$ we conclude that only two possibilities can occur

1) $d=1$, $g=0$, and $c_1({\cal F})=1$.

2) $d=0$ and $g=1$. $\square$

Now, I don't know if examples of second type exist, when $S$ is a torus and $deg(S)=0$. It is hard to believe that they exist. But at least let me give some examples of foliations of degree $0$ that don't have a transversal surface.

Example. Let $\cal F$ be a foliation on $\mathbb CP^2$ tangent to the orbits of action of some $\mathbb C^*$ action on $\mathbb CP^2$. This foliation has degree $0\ne 1$, so by the above claim the only surface transversal to $\cal F$ can be a degree $0$ torus. I claim that such tori don't exist.

Indeed, suppose by contradiction that $S$ is such a torus. Let's take a point $x\in S$. Then there is a $\mathbb C^*$-orbit $O$ passing through $x$. The closure of $O$ is a complex curve $\overline O$ in $\mathbb CP^2$. By the Remark in the beginning, there is an orientation of $S$ such that all points of intersection of $S$ with $\overline O$ are positive, i.e. $S\cdot \overline O\ge 1$. This contradicts to the fact that $\deg(S)=0$. $\square$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your answer. I try to understand its details. $\endgroup$ Commented May 5, 2019 at 18:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sure, Ali, please ask if you want to clarify something $\endgroup$ Commented May 6, 2019 at 16:26
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you again for your very interesting answer. i confess that it was difficult for me to understand the details of your great answer. I need to more effort for a complete understanding but the following two links help me to get the sketch of your proof. or example this link help me to see $c_1(F)\leq 1$ qcpages.qc.cuny.edu/~zakeri/papers/SHFC_zak.pdf and this MSE post help me to see the reason of "$3$" in "$3d$" in the left part of your formula (1) $\endgroup$ Commented May 24, 2019 at 7:48
  • $\begingroup$ math.stackexchange.com/questions/116040/… $\endgroup$ Commented May 24, 2019 at 7:49
  • $\begingroup$ However your argument assume that $S$ is compact otherwise we can not speak about a finite $d$. am i right? it is possible an immersed 9not embedded) holomorphic curve has infinite number of holes, Yes? moreover you assume that $S$ never intersect a singularity. So what about if we allow $S$ to intersect some singularities but at regular points the intersection would be transversal? $\endgroup$ Commented May 24, 2019 at 7:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .