I have a question regarding Littlewood’s three precepts of refereeing a mathematical paper, namely whether it is (1) new, (2) correct, and (3) interesting.
I have found these mentioned in the literature on refereeing, e.g.:
- “you should address Littlewoods’s three precepts: (1) Is it new? (2) Is it correct? Is it surprising?” (Krantz, 1997, p. 125); or
- “the fundamental precepts ‘Is it true?’, ‘Is it new?’, and ‘Is it interesting?’ to which, Littlewood believed, a referee should always respond.” (Moslehian, 2010: 1245)
Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to track down the original source. Does anyone know where Littlewood might have formulated these three precepts?
Thank you!
REFERENCES
Krantz, S. G. (1997). A Primer of Mathematical Writing: Being a Disquisition on Having Your Ideas Recorded, Typeset, Published, Read, and Appreciated. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Moslehian, M. S. (2010). Attributes of an ideal referee. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 57 (10), 1245. (pdf)