30
$\begingroup$

Define the cross-ratio of four real or complex numbers as follows: $$[a,b,c,d] = \frac{(a-c)(b-d)}{(a-d)(b-c)}.$$ Then its logarithm has the same symmetries as the curvature tensor: $$\log[a,b,c,d] = -\log[b,a,c,d] = -\log[a,b,d,c] = \log[c,d,a,b].$$ Moreover, if $[a,b,c,d] = \lambda$, then $[b,c,a,d] = 1 - \lambda^{-1}$ and $[c,a,b,d] = (1-\lambda)^{-1}$, which implies an analog of the algebraic Bianchi identity: $$\log[a,b,c,d] + \log[b,c,a,d] + \log[c,a,b,d] = \pi i.$$

Is there something behind these coincidences?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

19
$\begingroup$

There is an indirect connection which goes via the representation theory of the symmetric group. The symmetries of the Riemann tensor are equivalent to saying that $R$ transforms according to the two-dimensional irreducible representation of $\mathbb S_4$ corresponding to the partition $[2,2]$. On the other hand let us consider the moduli space $M_{0,4}$ parametrizing four distinct ordered points on the Riemann sphere up to Möbius transformations. The cohomology group $H^1(M_{0,4},\mathbf C)$ is $2$-dimensional, and transforms according to the representation $[2,2]$ under its natural action of $\mathbb S_4$. But we may compute this cohomology group as the space of holomorphic $1$-forms on $M_{0,4}$ with at most logarithmic poles at infinity. Moreover, the cross-ratio $\chi$ may be considered as a holomorphic function on $M_{0,4}$ and its logarithmic derivative $d \log(\chi)$ is such a 1-form with log poles. (Note that differentiating your analogue of the Bianchi identity gets rid of the $\pi i$, so we really get something exactly like the usual Bianchi identity!)

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you! I agree that $d \log (\chi)$ is a holomorphic 1-form on $M_{0,4}$, but cannot see how the curvature tensor enters the picture. Could you expand on this, please? $\endgroup$ Oct 13, 2018 at 16:31
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Well, I don't actually know a direct connection between the two. All I'm saying is that $d \log \chi$ and the curvature tensor have the following in common: they are both vectors in a representation of $\mathbb S_4$, and that representation happens to be the irrep corresponding to the partition $[2,2]$. If you write down the right Young symmetrizer you see that the symmetries and the Bianchi identity are exactly the conditions on a vector to transform according to this representation. I would be happy to see a direct link between the two. $\endgroup$ Oct 13, 2018 at 18:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.