3
$\begingroup$

Let $(M,g)$ be a smooth and compact Riemannian manifold. Suppose I have a "smoothly varying" (precisely formulating this is part of the question) one parameter family of Riemannian metrics $(M,g_t)$ that depends on a parameter $t \in [0,1]$. What I want to know is whether the procedure that turns a Riemannian manifold into a metric space is suitably continuous in some sense. More precisely,

a) Can I prove that there are uniform bound upper and lower bounds on the diameter $D(M,g_t)$?

b) Does the distance function between two points $m_1,m_2$ vary continuously with t?

What I would ideally like is a book that discusses this. Though a clear answer either way would work too obviously.

***I'm a little worried I'm going to get yelled at for this question. I'm sure for a researcher in differential geometry this is a trivial question, but it isn't my area and I do not know where to look for this information. It seems to fall into a gray area between Math Stackexchange and here, so I'd be grateful for some indulgence.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

About the formulation, I would see such a family as a smooth map from $[0,1]$ to the space of smoooth sections of $S^2T^*M$ which lands in the open set of sections with values in positively definite forms.

Next, about the diameter. Because $M$ is compact, you can find a Riemannian metric $g_M$ such that $g_t\le g_M$ for any $t\in [0,1]$ and, in particular, you have $\mathrm{diam}(M,g_t) \le \mathrm{diam}(M,g_M)$.

For question b, this is true as well. Given $x,y\in M$ and $t_0\in [0,1]$, consider a geodesic $\gamma_{t_0}$ between $x$ and $y$ relatively to $g_{t_0}$. The length of $\gamma_{t_0}$ with respect to $g_t$ varies smoothly with $t$, so you find that \begin{equation} (A) \quad \limsup_{t\to t_0} d_{g_t}(x,y) \le d_{g_{t_0}}(x,y) \end{equation}

Conversely, if $\gamma_t$ is geodesic of minimal length wrt $g_t$ between $x,y$, then one can choose a sequence $t_n \to t_0$ such that $\gamma_{t_n}'(0)$ converges to some unitary vector $X\in T_xM$. By the smooth dependence of the geodesic on the initial speed and the metric, the geodesics $\gamma_{t_n}$ will converge to the geodesic wrt $g_{t_0}$ with inital speed $X$. Therefore the length $d_{g_{t_n}}(x,y)=\ell(\gamma_{t_n}, g_{t_n})$ converges to $\ell(\gamma_{t_0}, g_{t_0}) \ge d_{g_{t_0}}(x,y)$, and ones gets the converse of the inequality (A) above.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.