4
$\begingroup$

Consider the following process: sample $n$ points uniformly at random in the unit square, and for each point $i$, let $d_i$ be the distance from $i$ to its nearest neighbor. Finally, let $z_i = d_i\sqrt{n}$. My question is, what is known about the limiting distribution for the $z_i$'s as $n\to\infty$? Here is a histogram for $n=10^6$:

Nearest neighbor distribution

I am most interested in the first-order behavior near $z=0$. It looks like we have $f(z) \approx 0.14z$ or thereabouts but for all I know it might not even be linear.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ What's the maximum, $\sqrt 2$? Looks like $>1.5$ in the figure $\endgroup$ Aug 26, 2018 at 22:48
  • $\begingroup$ Square root of exponential? $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2018 at 0:18
  • $\begingroup$ If points are distributed according to a Poisson process with intensity 1, the probability that a point has no neighbor in distance $r$ is $e^{-\pi r^2}$. $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2018 at 0:20
  • $\begingroup$ @BjørnKjos-Hanssen the maximum is actually $\sqrt{2n}$ because I scaled the nearest-neighbor distances by $\sqrt{n}$. The distribution just has a small tail. $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2018 at 2:36

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

If $n$ points are placed uniformly at random in the unit square, then the distribution is very close to a Poisson process with intensity $n$. Scaling the process by $\sqrt n$, it’s like a Poisson process with intensity 1. Conditioning a Poisson Process on the existence of a point at $x$, the remainder of the process is a Poisson process with the same intensity.

The probability that the nearest neighbor is more than $r$ away is the probability that a Poisson random variable with mean $\pi r^2$ takes the value 0, that is $e^{-\pi r^2}$. Differentiating, we see the density (which appears in your graph) is $2\pi re^{-\pi r^2}$.

The graph of this per wolfram alpha: enter image description here

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I see, is there a standard way to resolve the dependency between the samples? In other words, I understand that if I choose a single point and look at the nearest neighbor distance, I get the function you wrote, but does the fact that I took the nearest-neighbor distances from all $n$ points change anything? $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2018 at 2:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The dependency between points went away when I moved from having exactly $n$ points in the square to a Poisson process with intensity $n$ in the square. This is a very mild change. Things got even better when I moved to a Poisson process with intensity $n$ in the plane as that made the edge effects go away. $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2018 at 2:47
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, this is kind of unfamiliar territory for me. What I meant was, when I built my histogram, I sampled $n$ points and did a histogram of each of their nearest-neighbor distances. I'm having difficulty resolving the fact that those $n$ distances are dependent, and I think they continue to be dependent even if we take the Poisson process approximation, no? $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2018 at 4:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I see. Yes they are dependent in a single realization (=choice of points). For example if you take the closest pair of points, then the mutual distance is the minimum distance for both of them. But: since you are taking a large number of points, what you are really looking at is the distribution of the nearest neighbour distance from a single point. (This is essentially the strong law of large numbers: the number of points for which the nearest point is at distance in the range $[a/\sqrt n,b/\sqrt n]$ is $n$ times the probability that a single point has nearest point in that range). $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2018 at 5:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.