4
$\begingroup$

I want to know properties of the following sum: $$\sum_{j=0}^{p-1} \omega^{\beta j^2}= ~? $$ where $p$ is a prime, and $\omega^p=1$, is a $p$th root of unity (and $\beta$ is an integer between $0$ and $p-1$). If anyone has any references related to this, let me know.

Also, if someone can tell me about the sum: $$\sum_{j=0}^{p-1} \omega^{\beta j^n}= ~? $$ for higher values of $n$ such as 3, that would also be nice.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What are the $\beta_j$'s? $\endgroup$ Jan 16, 2018 at 8:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DesideriusSeverus I believe it is $\beta j$, not $\beta_j$, so $\beta$ is just some parameter. $\endgroup$ Jan 16, 2018 at 9:08
  • $\begingroup$ @BrendanMcKay Indeed, I should wear glasses! My question could be interpreted then as "is there any information on $\beta$? $\endgroup$ Jan 16, 2018 at 9:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks @Nemo for the links. I found the wikipedia article a bit later myself after some searching. $\endgroup$
    – guest17
    Jan 16, 2018 at 9:56

2 Answers 2

9
$\begingroup$

Your first sum is a special Gauss sum. For its value in general, see Corollary 9.16 in Montgomery-Vaughan: Multiplicative number theory I. Your second sum can also be expressed in terms of Gauss sums (associated with primitive characters modulo $p$), and in particular its absolute value is at most $(n-1)\sqrt{p}$, assuming $p\nmid\beta$. See Exercise 4c in Section 9.2.1 of the same book.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Hi,Thanks for the help; for $n=2$ the answer is now very explicit. But I was wondering if there is any simple result for the case when $n=3$. For example, if $p=3,~5,~11,~17$ the sum is equal to zero. So can anyone tell me the values of $p$ for which the sum is zero? I am sure there is a reasonably explicit closed form for the sum when $n=3$ at least. $\endgroup$
    – guest17
    Mar 7, 2019 at 10:26
  • $\begingroup$ @guest18: I don't think there is a simple closed form (even for $n=3$). On the other hand, it is easy to show (for general $n$ and $p\nmid\beta$) that the sum is zero if and only if $n$ is coprime to $p-1$. $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Mar 7, 2019 at 11:05
6
$\begingroup$

Experiment makes it clear that this sum is $\epsilon\delta\sqrt{p}$ where

  • $\epsilon=1$ if $p=1\pmod{4}$, and $\epsilon=i$ if $p=-1\pmod{4}$
  • $\delta=1$ if $\beta$ is a quadratic residue mod $p$, and $\delta=-1$ otherwise.

I have not tried to prove this, but I expect that number theorists will not find it hard.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ We will not find it hard indeed because it is well known, but it took Gauss four years... $\endgroup$
    – Olivier
    Jan 16, 2018 at 12:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.