6
$\begingroup$

I have to say that I have nearly no experience with this (as I always assume that my algebras are quiver algebras) so I do not know if this is apropriate for mathoverflow, but I give it a try. Given a field $k$ and a finite field extension $K$, then $K \otimes_k K$ is a selfinjective algebra. What selfinjective algebras can occur this way? Can they be classified depending on the field $k$? The most extreme case I saw was that the non-semisimple algebra $K[T]/(T^p)$ can occur. Can even a non-representation-finite algebra appear as $K \otimes_k K$?

Here a "extreme case": Let $k=F_p(X)$ and $K:=k[T]/(T^p-X)$, then $K \otimes_k K \cong K[T]/(T^p)$. I got this from Example 1.7.17 in the representaton theory book of Zimmermann, where he gives more details and reference.

Can we give a concrete example of a symmetric local algebra that is not isomorphic to $K \otimes_k K$ for some field extension $K$ of $k$. For example are the selfinjective algebras $F[x,y]/(x^p-y^q,xy,yx)$ of this form for some natural number $p, q \geq 2$ and some field $F$. Of course we have to make some assumption, like that the field has characteristic p since in characteristic 0 such a thing cant happen.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Can you provide a reference for your 'most extreme case'? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2017 at 15:49
  • $\begingroup$ @JulianKuelshammer Added details and reference. $\endgroup$
    – Mare
    Commented Aug 31, 2017 at 16:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $K\otimes_k K$ is semilocal, but not local unless $K$ is purely inseparable over $k$. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2017 at 16:08
  • $\begingroup$ @LaurentMoret-Bailly thanks, i deleted the local. Do you have an example where the result is not local? $\endgroup$
    – Mare
    Commented Aug 31, 2017 at 16:10
  • $\begingroup$ Let $L/K$ be Galois and consider $L\otimes_KL$. This is a product of fields. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2017 at 16:11

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

If you restrict attention to separable extensions then the picture is as follows. Let $\overline{k}$ be a separable closure of $k$ with Galois group $G$. If $X$ is a finite $G$-set we have a $k$-algebra $A(X)=\text{Map}_G(X,\overline{k})$. This construction gives an equivalence from the category of finite $G$-sets to the category of finite etale $k$-algebras. The finite separable extensions of $k$ just correspond to the $G$-sets on $X$ which $G$ acts transitively (so $X\simeq G/H$ for some $H$, and $A(X)=\overline{k}^H$). We can decompose any $X$ as a disjoint union of transitive $G$-sets, and this writes $A(X)$ as a product of fields. We also have $A(X)\otimes_kA(Y)=A(X\times Y)$. Thus, if $K=\overline{k}^H=A(G/H)$ then we can decompose $K\otimes_kK$ as a product of fields by decomposing $(G/H)\times(G/H)$ as a disjoint union of orbits.

On the other hand, you can consider $k=(\mathbb{Z}/p)(x_1,\dotsc,x_r)$ and define an inseparable field extension $K$ by adjoining $y_i$ with $y_i^p=x_i$ for all $i$. Then $K\otimes_kK$ is generated over $K$ by classes $z_i$ satisfying $z_i^p=x_i$, so the classes $u_i=z_i-y_i$ have $u_i^p=0$. It is not hard to see that $K\otimes_kK$ is just the truncated polynomial algebra generated by $u_1,\dotsc,u_r$ subject to $u_i^p=0$. My guess is that you can't get anything much more complicated than that.

[ADDED LATER]

A commutative finite-dimensional $k$-algebra $A$ is self-injective iff Gorenstein iff $\text{Hom}_k(A,k)$ is isomorphic to $A$ as an $A$-module. There are very many of these. If $(r_1,\dotsc,r_n)$ is any regular sequence in $k[x_1,\dotsc,x_n]$ then the quotient ring $Q=k[x_1,\dotsc,x_n]/(r_1,\dotsc,r_n)$ has this property. The cohomology ring of any closed manifold (with coefficients in $k$) has this property. One small example is $k[x,y]/(x^3,y^2+xy+x^2)$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, you gave examples that are not representation-finite. This raises the question if one can give a specific local selfinjective algebra that is not isomorphic to the tensor product of such fields. I added the question. $\endgroup$
    – Mare
    Commented Aug 31, 2017 at 16:53
  • $\begingroup$ It has to be $Hom_k(A,k)$ isomorphic to $A$ as $A$-module instead $k$-module I think. Also your equivalences are only true in case $A$ is commutative. My favorite criteria is that it is selfinjective iff its socle is simple in the local case. This might be the quickest thing to check. $\endgroup$
    – Mare
    Commented Aug 31, 2017 at 17:05
  • $\begingroup$ I have edited the answer to correct $k$-module to $A$-module, and to make clear that I am only considering the commutative case. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2017 at 17:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .