10
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a compact differentiable manifold of dimension $m$ or, if you prefer, a smooth complex projective manifold of complex dimension $n=m/2$.

The Euler characteristic $\chi(X):=\Sigma_{i=0}^{m}(-1)^ib_i(X)$ -the alternating sum of Betti numbers of $X$- is related to the Euler class $e(T_X)$ of the tangent bundle $T_X$ by $$\chi(X)=\int_Xe(T_X)$$ where $\int_X$ denotes contraction against the fundamental class $[X]$.

Is it possible to write each Betti number $b_i(X)$ as a "characteristic number", i.e. as an integral $$b_i(X)\stackrel{\text{?}}{=}\int_X\gamma_i(T_X)$$ of some "characteristic class" $\gamma_i$ of vector bundles? If not, why not?

This question is possibly related.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ Characteristic numbers are cobordism invariant, but Betti numbers are not. $\endgroup$
    – Gregory Arone
    Dec 25, 2016 at 18:38
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ By embedding a finite CW complex in Euclidean space, thickening it up to a (framed) manifold, and taking its double, you can get any betti numbers but have trivial tangent bundle and hence trivial characteristic classes. $\endgroup$
    – Oscar Randal-Williams
    Dec 25, 2016 at 18:41

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
17
$\begingroup$

No. The Stiefel-Whitney and Pontryagin numbers of a closed oriented manifold are cobordism invariants, but the Betti numbers are not.

More explicitly, all closed oriented $3$-manifolds are frameable (and null cobordant), so all of their characteristic numbers vanish, but e.g. the $3$-torus and $3$-sphere have different Betti numbers.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.