6
$\begingroup$

Let $V \colon [0,1]\times \mathbb R^d \to \mathbb R^d$ be a Borel vector field which is globally bounded, $V \in L^\infty$.

I am looking for a reference for the following result (which I suppose it is true and already been proved somewhere).

The set of integral curves of $V$, i.e.

$\displaystyle \mathcal C :=\big\{ \gamma \in C([0,1];\mathbb R^d): \gamma(s)-\gamma(t) - \int_t^s V(\tau,\gamma(\tau)) d\tau = 0, \quad \forall 0\le t \le s \le 1\big\}$

is a Borel set in the space of continuous path $C([0,1];\mathbb R^d)$ endowed with the topology inherited from the $\sup$ norm.

[The integral curves are defined for all times being the vector field bounded]

It is immediate to show that for continuous vector fields the statement holds (the set $\mathcal C$ is closed) but I do not find anything for the general case.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Are you assuming some continuity of $V$ in space? Otherwise I do not see what you mean by 'The integral curves are defined for all times being the vector field bounded' (you could lack existence/uniqueness). $\endgroup$
    – Mizar
    Nov 28, 2016 at 14:57
  • $\begingroup$ No, I am not assuming any continuity on the vector field and yes, you could lack existence/uniqueness (if you lack existence, however, the set $C$ is empty, hence in any case Borel :-)). Concerning the $L^\infty$ assumption, I put it because I think that if you have local existence of an integral curve for a bounded vector field, then the curve can be globally defined. $\endgroup$
    – Romeo
    Nov 28, 2016 at 15:02

1 Answer 1

5
+100
$\begingroup$

Actually this follows plainly as a consequence of an important classical result in descriptive set theory, namely, the set of all Borel real-valued functions on a metric space is the smallest class containing the continuous functions, and closed under point-wise convergence, that is, the Baire class. (And, of course, nothing changes, if you consider $\mathbb{R}^d$-valued maps instead, or also, maps valued in the unit ball of $\mathbb{R}^d$).

A suitable reference is e.g. A. S. Kechris' Classical Descriptive Set Theory, ch. 11, or this paper by R. W. Hansell available on-line, that contains all ingredients. (Alternatively, you may replace "Borel vector field" with "Baire vector field" in the statement).

For any bounded Borel map $V:[0,1]\times\mathbb{R}^d\to\mathbb{R}^d$ we can consider the operator $F_V$ on the Banach space $E:=C^0([0,1],\mathbb{R}^d), \|\cdot\|_\infty$ defined by $F_V( \gamma)(t)=\int_0^tV(\tau,\gamma(\tau))d\tau$ for any $\gamma\in E$ and $t\in[0,1]$. Two simple facts easily follow by bounded convergence:

  • If $V$ is continuous on $[0,1]\times\mathbb{R}^d$, then $F_V$ is continuous on $E$. Indeed, if $\gamma_n\to\gamma$ in $E$ $$\big\|F_V(\gamma )-F_V(\gamma_n)\big\|_\infty\le\int_0^1\big\|V(\tau,\gamma(\tau))-V(\tau,\gamma_n(\tau))\big\| d\tau=o(1).$$
  • If $V_n$ converges point-wise to $V$ on $[0,1]\times\mathbb{R}^d$, then $F_{V_n}$ converges point-wise to $F_V$ on $E$. Indeed, if $V_n\to V$ point-wise, then for any $\gamma\in E$ $$\big\|F_V(\gamma )-F_{V_n}(\gamma)\big\|_\infty\le\int_0^1\big\|V(\tau,\gamma(\tau))-V_n(\tau,\gamma(\tau))\big\| d\tau=o(1).$$

As a consequence, the set of all bounded Borel maps $V:[0,1]\times\mathbb{R}^d\to\mathbb{R}^d$ such that $F_V$ is a Borel map on $E$ contains all bounded continuous functions and it is closed under point-wise convergence. Therefore it is the whole class of bounded Borel maps.

To conclude, let's denote ${\mathbb 1}$ and $\mathrm{ev_0}$ the identity map on $E$, respectively, the evaluation at $0$ (seen as a bounded, linear rank-one operator on $E$). The set $$\mathcal{C}=\big\{\gamma\in E : \gamma(t)-F_V(\gamma)(t)-\gamma(0)=0,\; \forall\, t\in[0,1] \big\},$$ which is the zero-set of the Borel map ${\mathbb 1}-F_V-\mathrm{ev_0}$, is therefore a Borel set.

Rmk: From the above argument also follows by induction that, more precisely, if $V$ is in the Baire class $\alpha$ for a countable ordinal $\alpha$, then so is $F_A$ on $E$, so that $\mathcal{C}$ is in the corresponding Borel set hierarchy.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.