I have a question about the equation (1.24) in the paper about classical r-matrices.
It is said that when we put $\overline{r} = Pr$ in the equation (1.24): $$ \overline{r}_{23}\overline{r}_{12}P_{23} + \overline{r}_{23}P_{12}\overline{r}_{23} + P_{23}\overline{r}_{12}\overline{r}_{23} = \overline{r}_{12}\overline{r}_{23}P_{12} + \overline{r}_{12}P_{23}\overline{r}_{12} + P_{12}\overline{r}_{23}\overline{r}_{12}, $$ then we obtain the classical Yang-Baxter equation (1.16) $$ [r_{12}, r_{13}] + [r_{13}, r_{23}] + [r_{12}, r_{23}] = 0. $$ I try to prove this statement. But I encounter some problems.
I think that we have $$ (Pr)_{23} = P_{23} r_{23} P_{23} = P_{32}. $$
Therefore \begin{align} & \overline{r}_{23} \overline{r}_{12} P_{23} \\ & = P_{23} r_{23} P_{23} P_{12} r_{12} P_{12} P_{23} \\ & = r_{32} r_{21} P_{23}. \end{align}
But I don't know how to remove $P$ in $r_{32} r_{21} P_{23}$. How to prove the statement: when we put $\overline{r} = Pr$ in the equation (1.24), then we obtain the classical Yang-Baxter equation (1.16)? Thank you very much.