6
$\begingroup$

A pair of vector bundles over a base space $X$ is a pair $(E,F)$ where $E$ is a vector bundle over $X$ and $F$ is a sub-bundle of $E$. Two pairs $(E_{1},F_{1})$ and $(E_{2}, F_{2})$ are isomorphic if there is an isomorphism from $E_{1}$ to $E_{2}$ which send $F_{1}$ onto $F_{2}$. The direct sum of two pairs has a natural definition.

Are there some type of characteristic classes with values in the cohomology of base space with the following properties?:

It is trivial $("1")$ on the trivial pairs. Isomorphism pairs have the same characteristic classes. They commute with the pull back operation. They restrict (or have a reasonable relation)to the usual characteristic classes on pairs $(E,0)$ and $(\epsilon_{n}, F)$ where $\epsilon_{n}$ is the trivial $n$ dimensional bundle.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

8
$\begingroup$

You obviously have all characteristic classes of $E$, of $F$, and of $E/F$, with some relations because $E\cong F\oplus E/F$. To see if there are more, consider the classifying space for your pairs. If you are working over $\Bbbk$, $\mathrm{rk}(F)=k$, $\mathrm{rk}(E)=\ell$, it is the colimit over $n$ of the space of partial flags of length $(k,\ell)$ in $\Bbbk^n$. For a fixed $n$, this is homotopy equivalent to $$G_{k,\ell,n}(\Bbbk)=U(n,\Bbbk)/(U(k,\Bbbk)\times U(\ell-k,\Bbbk)\times U(n-\ell,\Bbbk))\;.$$ This space is the total space of (at least) three fibre bundles $G_{k,\ell}(\Bbbk)\hookrightarrow G_{k,\ell,n}(\Bbbk)\twoheadrightarrow G_{\ell,n}(\Bbbk)$ and $G_{\ell-k,n-k}(\Bbbk)\hookrightarrow G_{k,\ell,n}(\Bbbk)\twoheadrightarrow G_{k,n}(\Bbbk)$ and $G_{k,n+k-\ell}(\Bbbk)\hookrightarrow G_{k,\ell,n}(\Bbbk)\twoheadrightarrow G_{\ell-k,n}(\Bbbk)$. Hence, you can try the Leray-Serre spectral sequence to find characteristic classes not generated by those mentioned above.

In the holomorphic setting, you see Bott-Chern forms. If $E$ and $F$ are flat, you see the forms described in the appendix of Bismut-Lott. In both settings, you can sometimes extract cohomological information.

I am not sure there are similar classes in a purely topological setting, but I would personally go for $\Bbbk=\mathbb R$ first and look at $\mathbb Z/2$-valued cohomology.

EDIT: It seems there are no additional characteristic classes that do not come from $F$ or $E/F$. For consider the fibre bundle $G_{\ell-k,n-k}(\Bbbk)\hookrightarrow G_{k,\ell,n}(\Bbbk)\twoheadrightarrow G_{k,n}(\Bbbk)$. For sufficiently large $n$, all classes of $G_{\ell-k,n-k}(\Bbbk)$ of small degree come from the vector bundle $E/F$, and so are pulled back from $G_{k,\ell,n}(\Bbbk)$. Hence by the Leray-Hirsch theorem, in small degrees the cohomology ring of $G_{k,\ell,n}(\Bbbk)$ is generated by the characteristic classes of the vector bundles $F$ and $E/F$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer.as I understand from your answer, the isomorphic type of a pair $(E,F)$ is completely determined by $E,F,E/F$, since every short exact sequence of vector bundles split automatically(for compact base space). this motivates us to ask the following question: Let $A$ be a noncommutative $C^{*}$ algebra. Is it true to say that every short exact sequence of finite protective $A$- modules split automatically? $\endgroup$ Dec 18, 2015 at 20:31
  • $\begingroup$ If they are projective, that should follow from the definition. But you are right - your argument is way shorter than the one I gave. $\endgroup$ Dec 18, 2015 at 20:57
6
$\begingroup$

The characteristic classes of the virtual bundle $E-F$ seem to have all the properties you asked for.

If $c$ is a characteristic class of vector bundles satisfying a sum formula $$ c(E\oplus F) = c(E)c(F), $$ then $c(E-F)$ can be defined via the formula $$ c(E-F)c(F) = c(E), $$ or if the base $X$ is compact, $$ c(E-F) = \frac{c(E)}{c(F)}. $$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.