4
$\begingroup$

In Kolar, Michor, & Slovak's book Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, it is proved the exterior derivative is universal in the following sense.

Proposition 25.4. For $k>0$ all natural operators $\Lambda ^kT^\ast \rightsquigarrow \Lambda ^{k+1}T^\ast$ are constant multiples of the exterior derivative.

For relevant definition see e.g this question. However, being a natural operator turns out to be an equivariance condition, which does not seem as obviously desirable as commuting with diffeomorphisms. (Maybe this is equivalent somehow? I haven't had a chance to decode what jet-group equivariance really means.)

On the other hand, a result of Palais says the the exterior derivative is the only (apriori assumed) linear map which commutes with diffeomorphisms.

So yeah, I guess I'm just trying to understand the relationship between being a natural operator in the sense of the linked question, to pleasantly commuting with all diffeomorphisms.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The "exterior algebra" tag is hardly relevant. $\endgroup$ Nov 19, 2015 at 10:48
  • $\begingroup$ mathoverflow.net/questions/200723/are-there-any-natural-differential-operators-besides-d/ is probably relevant for your purposes? $\endgroup$ Nov 19, 2015 at 10:50

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

Naturality here means $f^*d\phi = d f^*\phi$ for any smooth map, diffeomorphism or not. This is formally stronger than requiring this just for diffeos. Eventually the two conditions are equivalent, after checking the results.

Edit:

Answer to Arrows comment.

If you require commuting only with pullbacks with diffeomorphisms, then even nonlinear operators of this kind $\Lambda^k T^*\to \Lambda^{k+1}T^*$ are multiples of the exterior derivative (see 25.4). But this commutes even with general pullbacks. For $k=0$, all natural operators are of the form $g\mapsto \phi(g).dg$ for some arbitrary smooth function $\phi:\mathbb R\to \mathbb R$ (see 25.5).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand: $G^2_m$-equivariance is equivalent to commuting with pullbacks of smooth maps which is in turn equivalent to commuting only with diffeomorphisms? Could you please be a little more detailed? I'm not familiar with this field. $\endgroup$
    – Arrow
    Nov 17, 2015 at 9:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.