2
$\begingroup$

Notation: Let $K/\mathbb{Q}$ be a quadratic number field; let $p\geq 3$ be a rational prime and let $\mathfrak{p}$ denote a prime lying above $p$; let $K_{\mathfrak{p}}$ denote the completion of $K$ with respect to the prime $\mathfrak{p}$; let $R$ denote the ring of integers of $K_{\mathfrak{p}}$.

Let $E/\mathbb{Q}$ be an elliptic curve define over $\mathbb{Q}$, however, we want to consider $E$ as an elliptic curve over $K$. Suppose that $v_{\mathfrak{p}}(j(E)) \geq 0$, which is equivalent to $j(E) \in R$. From Proposition VII.5.5 of Silverman's AEC, we know that $E$ has potential good reduction at $\mathfrak{p}$, meaning that there exists a finite extension $K'/K$ such that $E$ has good reduction modulo all primes $\mathfrak{p}_{K'}|\mathfrak{p}$ over $K'$.

Question: Can we pick $K'/K$ to be a normal extension such that $\gcd(p,[K':K]) = 1$?

Assumptions: I know that $E/\mathbb{Q}$ does not have any $\mathbb{Q}$-rational torsion of prime order, however, over the quadratic extension $K$, $E$ does gain a $K$-rational point of order 3,5 or 7. Also, one may assume that $K$ has class number 1, if that helps.

Example: In a paper of Frey, he constructs such extensions for elliptic curves defined over $\mathbb{Q}$ that have a $\mathbb{Q}$-rational point $P$ of order $p$ for $p\in \{5,7\}$, where $P$ is not contained in the kernel of reduction modulo $p$. In particular, he writes if $v_p(j(E)) \geq 0$, then $E$ has good reduction modulo all primes $\mathfrak{p}_N | p$ where $$N = \mathbb{Q}(\zeta_{12},\sqrt[12]{p}).$$ The case of $p = 3$ is dealt with separately.

Intial Idea: From the proof of Proposition VII.5.5, one can take $K'$ to be the extension of $K$ over which $E$ has a Weierstrass equation in Legendre form. From Proposition III.1.7 of Silverman's AEC, we have a procedure for writing $E$ in Legendre form using the defining cubic equation, however, it is not immediately clear to me how to use this construction to determine the degree of $K'$ over $K$.

Thank you in advance for you time!

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Every abelian variety $A/K$ acquires stable reduction over the normal extension $K(A[12])/K$. This is an extension of bounded degree, when $\dim{A}$ is fixed. $\endgroup$ Nov 13, 2015 at 19:53
  • $\begingroup$ @VesselinDimitrov Thank you for the comment. This does help me for the cases when $p = 5$ or $7$, however, I am still a bit confused about the case when $p=3$. Under my assumption, the elliptic curve $E/K$ has a $K$-rational points of order 3. Since $K(E[3]) \subseteq K(E[12])$, this would imply that $3$ divides the degree of the normal extension over which $E$ acquires stable reduction. $\endgroup$ Nov 13, 2015 at 21:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I shouldn't think one can do this for p=3 in general. If the image of inertia at 3 in the ell-adic representation has order a multiple of 3 (and I don't see why this can't happen) then you'll need an extension of order a multiple of 3 to kill it. $\endgroup$
    – eric
    Nov 13, 2015 at 21:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you want to find an explicit example just browse through some table of elliptic curves trying the ones with integral j-invariant at 3 and conductor a multiple of 3, and then just compute how 3 ramifies in the field cut out by the 2-torsion. The moment you find an example where inertia has order a multiple of 3 you might be in trouble. $\endgroup$
    – eric
    Nov 14, 2015 at 0:15
  • $\begingroup$ @eric Thank you for you comments. After running through some examples, I do agree with you. In above mentioned work, Frey only considers the elliptic curve $y^2 = x^3 + 1$ for $p=3$, which is why I wrote that it is dealt with separately. However, it seems as though this is a special case. $\endgroup$ Nov 14, 2015 at 16:43

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.