9
$\begingroup$

What is the BRST-anti-BRST formalism? Is the Sp(2) doublet the ghost, antighost pair? Introductory accounts of this subject seem to be hard to find. I would appreciate a reference for someone who knows BRST well.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

Jim. I think the following references might be helpful:

The idea seems to be to choose a non-minimal (with extra ghosts and anti-fields) solution of the usual BRST (or BV-BRST) master equation with extra structure (invariance with respect to an anti-BRST transformation, which is another cohomological vector field/differential). As far as I can tell, the main difference/advantage seems to be in how the gauge fixing is done. In the usual formalism, one adds a BRST-exact term to the Hamiltonian (or action), which is the image of a gauge fixing fermion under the BRST transformation. In this non-minimal formalism, the gauge fixing fermion is itself chosen to be anti-BRST exact, which means that it is the image of a gauge fixing boson under the anti-BRST transformation.

I'm afraid that I'm not familiar enough with the applications of this formalism to judge why this way of gauge fixing is actually advantageous. I also can't comment intelligently about the $sp(2)$ structure.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks especially for the precise references - see also my next comment $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16, 2014 at 14:45
3
$\begingroup$

To complete Igor Khavkine's answer: as explained here, in the Sp(2) covariant description the BRST and anti-BRST charges form a doublet with opposite ghost number.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I was aware of those words ` the BRST and anti-BRST charges form a doublet' but had missed where anyone mentioned the ghost numbers - would an example be ghost,antighost in the BV case? will study the refs $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16, 2014 at 14:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .