5
$\begingroup$

Is there a standard name or standard symbol for the binary operation that combines $x$ and $y$ to give $xy/(x+y)$, or equivalently $1/(1/x+1/y)$? (At least the expressions are equivalent if we ignore the case where $x$ or $y$ is 0.)

One possible name that comes to mind is "harmonic sum", but some might say that the harmonic sum of $x$ and $y$ should be defined as $1/x+1/y$.

Another possibility is "cosum" or "co-sum", since the relationship between this operation and ordinary addition is analogous to (and indeed tropicalizes to) the relationship between the operations min and max.

Anyway, in addition to knowing what to call this operation, I'd also like to know how to write it, if there is some existing notation for it.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
4
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Harmonic mean, up to a constant factor. $\endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jun 29, 2013 at 4:18
  • $\begingroup$ Harmonic half-mean? $\endgroup$
    – Włodzimierz Holsztyński
    Jun 29, 2013 at 6:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Harmonic sum seems like a fine term by analogy with harmonic mean. $\endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jun 29, 2013 at 7:41
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ A good symbol would be $x\parallel y$, since $1/(\frac 1x+ \frac 1y)$ is the resistance of a parallel connection of resistances $x$ and $y$. $\endgroup$
    – Richard Stanley
    Jun 29, 2013 at 13:16

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
4
$\begingroup$

$ x +^{-1} y $ seems like a good notation in that $x^{-1}+^{-1} y^{-1}=(x+y)^{-1} $, and $$ \frac{1}{x}\frac{1}{+}\frac{1}{y} = \frac{1}{x+y} $$ (is this the "Freshman's Dream" in another incarnation?)

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I like Richard Stanley's suggested notation best, and I plan to use the term "harmonic sum" (unless someone points out existing notation and/or terminology).

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_and_parallel_circuits#Notation $\endgroup$
    – JRN
    Jul 2, 2013 at 2:35
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Joel: Thanks for pointing out that Richard Stanley's suggested notation is already in, er, current use. :-) $\endgroup$
    – James Propp
    Jul 2, 2013 at 12:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The suggested notation has a lot of potential. $\endgroup$
    – JRN
    Jul 2, 2013 at 23:24
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ In LaTeX, you should use x\mathbin\parallel y instead of the more obvious x\parallel y, so that you get the spacing of a binary operator as opposed to a relation symbol (You can say \def\hsum{\mathbin\parallel} in your prelude, for example) $\endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 8, 2013 at 4:24
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Probably this won't be an issue, but just so you're aware of it, in number theory the notation $p^k\mathbin\parallel n$ is often used to indicate that $p^k$ divides $n$, but $p^{k+1}$ does not divide $n$, i.e., it's a quick way to indicate that $k$ is $\text{ord}_p(n)$, the (normalized) $p$-adic valuation of $n$. $\endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    Aug 15, 2013 at 2:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.