8
$\begingroup$

As is well known, the Hilbert scheme of two points on a given smooth projective variety X are blow up along diagonal of product of X and then quotient the Z2 action. It is smooth. My question is whether Hilbert schemes of 3 points on arbitrary smooth projective varieties are smooth. If so, why and how to describe the geometry of them?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For surfaces, $\textrm{Hilb}^[n]$ is smooth for any $n$ (this is a classical result of Fogarty) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 5, 2012 at 11:48
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ A useful reference might be the article of Fantechi and Göttsche "The cohomology ring of the Hilbert scheme of 3 points on a smooth projective variety." J. Reine Angew. Math. 439 (1993), 147–158. $\endgroup$
    – naf
    Commented Sep 5, 2012 at 13:18

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

Yes, the Hilbert scheme of 3 points on a smooth variety is smooth. I don't know of a global description for the resulting Hilbert scheme, but here's the local reason this is true.

  1. Every length 3 scheme is abstractly isomorphic to a subscheme of the plane.
  2. For a zero dimensional subscheme $\text{Spec} A$ of a smooth variety $X$, there is a natural functorial map from embedded deformations of $\text{Spec} A\subseteq X$ to abstract deformations of $\text{Spec} A$, and this map is smooth.

Fact 1 is easy. Fact 2 takes more work, but it follows from some elementary arguments about deformation theory for affine schemes. Combining these facts: $\text{Spec} A$ is a smooth point of $\text{Hilb}^3 X$ if and only if the miniversal abstract deformation ring of $\text{Spec} A$ is smooth if and only if, after any reembedding of $\text{Spec} A$ into $\mathbb A^2$ we have that $\text{Spec} A$ is a smooth point of $\text{Hilb}^3 \mathbb A^2$; the last statement is true by Fogarty.

If somebody has a global description of the resulting Hilbert scheme, I would be very curious!

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for your detailed answer. I am curious about the global description too. $\endgroup$
    – Allen
    Commented Sep 5, 2012 at 12:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .