7
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a discrete group which is amenable (i.e. it admits an left-invariant mean, i.e. a continuous positive normalised linear functional $m:\ell^\infty(G) \to \mathbb{R}$ such that $\forall g \in G, m \circ \lambda_g = m$ where $\lambda_g : \ell^\infty(G) \to \ell^\infty(G)$ is the left-regular action of $G$). Let $\mathcal{M}$ be the set of all invariant means on $G$.

Let $c_0(G)$ be the space of bounded functions decreasing to $0$ at $\infty$ (i.e. $f \in c_0(G)$ if $f$ is in the closure of the space of finitely supported functions, i.e. $f \in \ell^\infty(G)$ and $\forall \epsilon >0$ there exists a finite set $F \subset G$ with $\lVert f\rVert_{\ell^\infty(G \setminus F)} \leq \epsilon$).

It's not difficult to see that $c_0(G)$ is included in the kernel of all (left- or right- or bi-)invariant mean, provided $G$ is infinite. When $G$ is finite, there is only one such mean, and it is trivial to compute the kernel. However the cardinality of $\mathcal{M}$ is otherwise quite big (if I remember correctly, it is uncountable for $G=\mathbb{Z}$).

Question: Assuming $G$ is infinite, is there a description/characterisation of the elements of $\ell^\infty(G)$ which belong to the kernel of all the invariant means, i.e. $\bigcap_{m \in \mathcal{M}} \ker m$?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ The trivial answer would be the closed linear span of $\lbrace f-\lambda_g(f) : g \in G,\ f\in\ell_\infty G\rbrace$. $\endgroup$ Aug 18, 2012 at 13:06
  • $\begingroup$ Did you compute it for $\mathbb{Z}$? $\endgroup$
    – user6976
    Aug 18, 2012 at 13:07
  • $\begingroup$ Is this MO question useful to you? mathoverflow.net/questions/65325/… $\endgroup$ Aug 18, 2012 at 13:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Mark: I'm not sure if this is explicit enough, but take any Folner sequence $F_n$. Then, $f$ has mean zero iff $\lim_{n\to\infty}\sup_{x\in G}|\sum_{y\in F_nx}f(y)|/|F_n|=0$. $\because$ If it's nonzero, then the uniform measure on $F_nx_n$ tends to an invariant mean which is nonzero at $f$. The converse follows from the fact that $f_n(x):=\sum_{y\in F_nx}f(y)/|F_n|$ has the same mean as $f$. $\endgroup$ Aug 18, 2012 at 16:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the comments and references, it makes a good enough answer for me too! $\endgroup$
    – ARG
    Aug 19, 2012 at 10:08

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

(Essentially from Narutaka Ozawa's comments)

Let $K = \bigcap_{m \in \mathcal{M}} \ker m$. The trivial answer would be that $K$ is the closed linear span of $$S =\{f-\lambda_g(f):\;g\in G,\;f\in\ell^\infty(G) \}.$$

For a non-amenable group this is all of $\ell^\infty(G)$. For an amenable group with Følner net $(F_i)$, then for any $f \in K$
$$\lim_{i\to\infty}\sup_{x\in G}\frac{\left|\sum_{y\in F_ix}f(y)\right|}{|F_i|}=0.$$ Indeed, if it's nonzero, we can find $(x_i)$ such that $$\limsup\frac{\left|\sum_{y\in F_ix_i}f(y)\right|}{|F_i|}>0;$$ then the uniform measure on $F_ix_i$ accumulates to an invariant mean that is non-zero at $f$.

Hence, if $f \in K$, then $$f_i(x)=\sum_{y\in F_ix}\frac{f(y)}{|F_i|}$$ has the same mean as $f$ for every invariant mean. A consequence of the above is that $\|f_i\|_{\ell^\infty} \to 0$. Thus $f - f_i \in S$ and $f-f_i \to f$ which shows that $K \subset \overline{S}$.

The inclusion $\overline{S} \subset K$ is a direct consequence of the invariance of the mean.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ I made quite a big edit, please feel free to roll back if I messed it up. Reading this proof after a few year, the crucial point that elements of $K$ are limits of elements of $S$ was hard to understand. $\endgroup$
    – ARG
    Mar 7, 2022 at 13:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ARG it's fine; just prefer $\bigcap$ (bigcap) for multiple intersections to $\cap$ (cap) which is only for intersections as binary operator. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Mar 7, 2022 at 13:06
  • $\begingroup$ ah, sorry... I usually use \displaystyle (which normally turns the $\cap$ into $\bigcap$ automatically) but forgot to do it here $\endgroup$
    – ARG
    Mar 7, 2022 at 13:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ARG, \displaystyle doesn't convert $\cap$ \cap to $\bigcap$ \bigcap; see $\cap\bigcap\displaystyle\cap\bigcap$ \cap\bigcap\displaystyle\cap\bigcap. You always need to use it manually when appropriate. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Mar 7, 2022 at 14:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Lspice oh! cool, thanks for the latex-info! As for the math: it is not trivial to me! (that's most of the content of the answer). (1) any element of the kernel satisfies (*) (the equation with $\displaystyle \lim_{i \to \infty} \sup_{x \in G} ... =0$) (2) so do the $f_i$ (because they also have 0 mean. (3) $f-f_i \in S$ (it's a convex combination of some $f - \lambda_g f$) (4) because of (2), the $f-f_i$ tend to $f$ (for this you have to interpret (2) as saying that the $f_i \to 0$ in norm). (5) this is how you show $K$ is contained in the closure of $S$. $\endgroup$
    – ARG
    Mar 7, 2022 at 14:28
0
$\begingroup$

The answer is in this paper: Yuji Takahashi, Functions with a unique mean value and amenability. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 121 (1994), 775-777 (Freely accessible here on AMS' site)

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually, Yuji Takahashi only cites the Theorem 1.1 (and proves something nice in the context) in Rosenblatt and Yang which essentially answers the question. (There it is formulated as a result on functions which always have the same means, so you have to consider the constant function.) The Paper of Rosenblatt and Yang is also freely availiable. $\endgroup$
    – ARG
    Mar 7, 2022 at 13:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ARG, to protect against re-organisations of journal sites (Springer is a particularly bad offender, for example), it is often good to link to the DOI when possible: Rosenblatt and Yang - Functions with a unique mean value. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Mar 7, 2022 at 14:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.