1
$\begingroup$

Some constructions can be seen as objects representing a functor.

For example,

  • Consider a topological group $G$ and a functor $\mathcal{F}:\text{Top}\rightarrow \text{Gpd}$ defined as $M\mapsto \mathcal{F}(M)$ where $\mathcal{F}(M)$ is the category of principal $G$-bundles over $M$ (whose objects are principal $G$-bundles over $M$ and morphisms are $G$-equivariant maps that induce identity on base spaces). Here, $\text{Top}$ is with morphisms as homotopy classes of continuous maps. In case this functor $\mathcal{F}$ is representable, then, we should get an object $\mathcal{F}_G$ of $\text{Top}$, that is a topological space, such that $\mathcal{F}(M)\cong \text{Hom}(M,\mathcal{F}_G)$ for each $M$ in $\text{Top}$. Then it is understood that this is a representable functor and the object of $\text{Top}$ representing this functor is denoted by $BG$, called the classifying space of $G$. I see many times that same can be said about $G$ being Lie group, but, I am not very confident about this, so, not saying anything more.
  • Consider a commutative ring $R$ and $R$-modules $M,N$ with a functor $\mathcal{F}:R\text{-Mod}\rightarrow \text{Set}$ defined as $Q\mapsto \mathcal{F}(Q)$ where $\mathcal{F}(Q)$ is the set of bilinear maps $M\times N\rightarrow Q$. In case this functor $\mathcal{F}$ is representable, then, we we should get an object get an $R$-module $\mathcal{F}_{M,N}$ such that $\mathcal{F}(Q)\cong \text{Hom}(\mathcal{F}_{M,N},Q)$ for each $Q$ in $R\text{-Mod}$. Then, it is understood that this functor is rep. and the object of $R\text{-Mod}$ representing this functor is denoted by $M\otimes_RN$, called the tensor product of $M$ and $N$.
  • Consider the category $\mathcal{C}$ of CW complexes with morphisms as homotopy classes of continuous maps and a functor $\mathcal{F}^n:\mathcal{C}\rightarrow \text{Set}$ defined as $M\mapsto \mathcal{F}^n(M)$, where $\mathcal{F}^n(M)$ is the set underlying the cohomology group $H^n(M,\mathbb{Z})$. In case this functor $\mathcal{F}^n$ is representable, then, we should get an object $\mathcal{F}^n_n$ of $\mathcal{C}$, that is a CW comple, such that $\mathcal{F}^n(M)=\text{Hom}(M,\mathcal{F}^n_n)$ for each $M$ in $\mathcal{C}$. Then, it is understood that this is a representable functor and the object of $\mathcal{C}$ representing this functor is denoted by $K(\mathbb{Z},n)$, called the Eilenberg-Maclane space of degree $n$.

Are there any other such constructions that can be introduced using the notion of representable functor. There is a restriction of maximum 5 tags, but constructions from any field are welcome.

As mentioned by Laurent Moret-Bailly, Dmitri Pavlov most constructions in category theory can be expressed in terms of Representable functors. I am looking for some non trivial examples, I do not have any precise definition of "non trivial" yet.

$\endgroup$
10
  • 14
    $\begingroup$ Any "universal property" can be expressed in terms of a representable functor, so I wouldn't know where to start, or where to stop. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2019 at 9:23
  • $\begingroup$ A probable example would be the finite category of graphs and the functor consisting of graph homomorphisms. May be it would be representable. Or consider the category of quivers $\endgroup$
    – vidyarthi
    Commented Aug 31, 2019 at 10:36
  • $\begingroup$ @LaurentMoret-Bailly I am not able to fill details immediately but I do agree there is a close relation between "universal property" and representable functors... Thank you for the comment.. I will try to make my question more sensible... $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2019 at 11:37
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ The first and third examples are incorrect as stated. Top is a category, so the set of morphisms M→F_G cannot be equivalent (let alone isomorphic) to a groupoid. The third example suffers from a similar mistake: one must take homotopy classes of maps, so this will not be a representable functor on Top. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2019 at 16:27
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Concerning the general question: almost all definitions in category theory can be expressed using representable functors, including limits (such as products, pullback, equalizers), colimits (such as coproducts, pushouts, coequalizers), left and right adjoint functors, ends and coends, left and right Kan extensions, etc. So the question, quite literally, asks to list a substantial fraction of mathematics. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2019 at 16:30

0

You must log in to answer this question.