2
$\begingroup$

I am reasonably certain this is the case, but can't find a reference that actually states this, although the Wikipedia article states something close.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

It is possible to have all the subsets of R be measurable (Solovay, Robert M. (1970). "A model of set-theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable". Annals of Mathematics. Second Series 92: 1–56.) which implies the nonexistence of a well ordering of R.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Alright, so I think I know what the argument should be: a well-ordering of R induces a well-ordering of the Borel algebra, so we can bijectively assign to every r a Borel set B(r) and let S = {r | r \not \in B(r)}). This subset is non-empty because some B(r) is the empty set, and it is clearly non-measurable. Is this correct? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 23:18
  • $\begingroup$ Well, you should also make it not differ from any Borel by a null set, and for this you need to also simultaneously diagonalize on the null Borel sets. But yeah, that's the idea. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 11, 2009 at 23:25
  • $\begingroup$ One minor quibble is that Solovay's model requires the existence of an inaccessible. This is a minor assumption, but it is unnecessary here. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 0:05
  • $\begingroup$ Richard: you're right, I forgot about that. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 0:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Qiaochu: there's a classical argument for this. Let $X$ and $Y$ be two independent $U[0,1]$ RV. What is the probability that $X<Y$ in the well-ordering? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 12, 2009 at 0:27
3
$\begingroup$

Yes. Here's a sketched example:

Start in L. Let P be the forcing which adds ω1 many Cohen reals, and let G be an L-generic filter for P. Then L(ℝ)L[G] will model ZF, but will have no well ordering of the reals. The point is that if σ is an automorphism of P, then σ can be extended to an elementary map from L[G] to L[σ[G]], and this extension will fix L(ℝ)L[G]. So if there was a well ordering of ℝ in L(ℝ)L[G], it would give a well ordering of G which was fixed by σ. But σ can reorder the elements of G because of the homogeneity of P.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .