0
$\begingroup$

According to a course about $\sigma$-agebras in infinite dimensional space they said that it is easy to see that :

$$\mathcal{E}(X)=\mathcal{E}(X,X^*)$$

where:

  • $X$ is separable real Banach space.
  • $\mathcal{E}(X)$ is the $\sigma$-algebra generated by cylindrical sets, i.e., the sets of the form $$ C=\{x\in X:\ (f_1(x),...,f_n(x))\in C_0\} $$ where $f_1,...,f_n\in X^*$ and $C_0\in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^n)$
  • $\mathcal{E}(X,X^*)$ the $\sigma$-algebra generated by $X^*$ on $X$ i.e. the smallest $\sigma$-algebra such that all the functions $f\in X^*$ are measurable.

Question:

How did they prove such equality which seems to me not obvious ?!

Thank you for your time.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Unless I'm missing something, that actually seem obvious: the $\sigma$-algebra you defined make all the linear form measurable, and conversely, any $\sigma$-algebra that makes the linear form measurable have to contain those cylindrical sets... $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 12:44
  • $\begingroup$ I agree with Simon that this is rather obvious, but let me give a hint for the part that might be slightly less obvious. Consider the family of subsets $C_0\subseteq\mathbb R^n$ such that the corresponding $C$ (as in your definition of $\mathcal E(X)$) is in $\mathcal E(X,X^*)$. Check that this family is a $\sigma$-algebra containing the basic open sets in $\mathbb R^n$ (rectangular boxes) and therefore containing all the Borel sets in $\mathbb R^n$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 12:52
  • $\begingroup$ A somewhat less obvious fact (though still not too hard to prove) is that both $\sigma$-algebras equal the Borel $\sigma$-algebra on $X$. In particular, the norm and weak topologies have the same Borel sets. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 14:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ houda's question is OK even when $X$ is non-separable, but Nate's isn't. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 15:25

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .