0
$\begingroup$

I asked the following on MSE a few weeks ago but I did not get any answer : https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1039593/carlsons-translatability-are-theses-characterisations-equivalent

Reference : "strong measure zero and strongly meager sets", Timothy Carlson (p.582).

Suppose $\kappa$ is a cardinal number and $\mathcal{U}$ is a set of subsets of a group $G$. $\mathcal{U}$ is $\kappa$-translatable if for every $A$ in $\mathcal{U}$ there is a $B$ in $\mathcal{U}$ such that the union of any $\kappa$ many translates of $B$ is contained in a translate of $A$.

Here is what Carlson says :

Notice that if $\mathcal{U}$ is a filter then $\mathcal{U}$ is $\kappa$-translatable iff for every $A$ in the dual ideal there is a $B$ in the dual ideal such that the intersection of any $\kappa$ translates of $B$ contains a translate of $A$. Hence, $\mathcal{U}$ is $\kappa$-translatable iff for every $A$ in the dual ideal there is $B$ in the dual ideal such that the union of any $\kappa$ translates of $A$ is contained in a translate of $B$.

The second iff is not transparently clear to me...

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Some reason you can't ask Carlson? I hope he's OK. $\endgroup$
    – bof
    Commented Jun 7, 2015 at 11:22
  • $\begingroup$ First I thought I was just being dumb and couldn't see something obvious. Now that it appears that it's not obvious to other people too, I'll ask Carlson and I will post the answer here. $\endgroup$
    – JoeDoe
    Commented Jun 7, 2015 at 12:24

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .