2
$\begingroup$

Is the number of a set of irreducible projective characters with associated factor set always strictly less than the number of the ordinary irreducible characters of a finite group G? If so, can you provide me with the relevant references.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The following is just a follow up to my previous question. I have a finite group $H$ with 14 ordinary characters. The Schur multiplier $M(H) \cong 2^2$. Hence the group $H$ will have 3 sets of projective characters with non-trivial factor sets $\alpha_i^{-1}$ of order 2, $i =1,2,3$. How to I prove that the cardinality of each of the three sets of projective characters with factor sets $\alpha_i^{-1}$ cannot exceed $|Irr(H)| =14$ . Perhaps Geoff Robinson can be of help here again. $\endgroup$
    – A.L. Prins
    Commented May 3, 2014 at 15:49
  • $\begingroup$ The other questions are mathoverflow.net/questions/165132/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/779460/… $\endgroup$ Commented May 4, 2014 at 20:20

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

This is, of course, a well-known fact (though the inequality need not be strict), but here's one proof. Let $H$ be a finite group, $Z$ be a central subgroup, and $\lambda$ be a linear character of $Z.$ Then the number of irreducible characters of $H$ which lie over $\lambda$ is $\sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr(H)}} \frac{\langle {\rm Res}^{H}_{Z}(\chi), \lambda \rangle}{\chi(1)}.$ Now for each $z \in Z$, the quantity $\sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr}(G)} \frac{\chi (z)}{\chi(1)}$ is non-negative,as was probably known to Burnside, and is non-zero if and only if $z$ is a commutator in $H$ (which certainly was known to Burnside, though set as an exercise in his book). It follows easily that for any irreducible character $\lambda$ of $Z,$ we have $ \sum_{z \in Z} \left( \sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr}(H)} \frac{\chi(z)}{\chi(1)} \right) \lambda(z^{-1}) \leq \sum_{z \in Z}\sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr}(H)} \frac{\chi(z)}{\chi(1)} = |Z| k(H/Z),$ where $k(X)$ denotes the number of conjugacy classes of $X.$ The last equality follows because the irreducible characters of $H$ with $Z$ in their kernels are precisely those which contain the trivial character on restriction to $Z.$ Hence $\sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr(H)}} \frac{\langle {\rm Res}^{H}_{Z}(\chi), \lambda \rangle}{\chi(1)} \leq k(H/Z),$ as claimed. Furthermore, if there is a non-identity element $z \in Z \backslash {\rm ker}(\lambda)$ which is a commutator in $H$, then the inequality becomes strict because $\lambda(z^{-1})$ has real part less than $1$. If there is no such commutator $z$, then we have $ \left( \sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr}(H)} \frac{\chi(z)}{\chi(1)} \right) \lambda(z^{-1}) = \sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr}(H)} \frac{\chi(z)}{\chi(1)} $ for each $z \in Z$ and then $\sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr(H)}} \frac{\langle {\rm Res}^{H}_{Z}(\chi), \lambda \rangle}{\chi(1)} = k(H/Z).$

Note that given a factor set $\alpha$ taking values in roots of unity and associated to a finite group ${\tilde H},$ we obtain a finite group $H$ with $H/Z \cong {\tilde H},$ where $Z$ is a central subgroup.

Since the OP could not find a reference, here is a proof of the inequality of Burnside. Note that an element $x \in G$ is a (simple) commutator if and only if $x = y^{-1}z$ for conjugate elements $y,z \in G.$ Now for $x \in G,$ the number of times that $x$ may be expressed in the form $a^{-1}b$ with $a,b$ both conjugate to $y$ is given by the class algebra constant formula $\frac{|G|}{|C_{G}(y)|^{2}} \sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr}(G)}\frac{|\chi(y)|^{2} \chi(x^{-1})}{\chi(1)}$. This is clearly a non-negative integer, and is certainly real. We may take the complex conjugate, and multiply through by $|C_{G}(y)|$ to deduce that $\frac{|G|}{|C_{G}(y)|} \sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr}(G)}\frac{|\chi(y)|^{2} \chi(x)}{\chi(1)}$ is real and non-negative. Summing over a set of representatives $y$ for the conjugacy classes of $G,$ we may conclude that $|G| \sum_{\chi \in {\rm Irr}(G)}\frac{\chi(x)}{\chi(1)}$ is real and non-negative, and is strictly positive if and only if $x$ is a commutator.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Geoff Robinson answer my question which I asked on the 12 April 2014. Please, Geoff can you give me the reference to the inequality Burnside proved. Also, you mentioned the answer to my question is a known fact, so can you supply me with some references where they proved it. $\endgroup$
    – user50002
    Commented Apr 25, 2014 at 8:33
  • $\begingroup$ It is somewhere in Burnside's book "Theory of groups.." that $\sum_{\chi} \frac{\chi(g)}{\chi(1)}$ is non-zero if and only if $g$ is a commutator, and is positive if $g$ is a commutator. For the other question, maybe work of P.X. Gallagher ( or is it Gallacher?). It is "well-known" to specialists. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 25, 2014 at 9:17
  • $\begingroup$ Please ,Geoff I tried to find some references as you suggested, but was not successful. Perhaps you will be more fortunate to find at least one valid reference. $\endgroup$
    – A.L. Prins
    Commented Apr 28, 2014 at 13:36
  • $\begingroup$ I didn't understand it the first time, but the second time you told me it was perfectly clear (and your edit is perfectly clear). The Burnside/Gallagher remarks are just FYI, so I'll delete those too. Thanks for helping me understand projective characters. Grouping them by lambda instead of alpha makes more sense to me. $\endgroup$ Commented May 5, 2014 at 22:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .