12
$\begingroup$

While studying universal constructions on principal bundles, I've stuck on a quite a basic question, namely:

Given a Lie group $G$, does there exist a principal $G$-bundle $\pi \colon P \to B$, for some base $B$, that admits a connection $\theta$ whose holonomy group is the full group $G$?

I suppose the answer is yes, but I have no idea of how to prove it.

$\endgroup$
8
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ I suppose you mean to ask whether there is a principal $G$-bundle $\pi:P\to B$ for some base $B$ that has a connection $\theta$ whose holonomy is the full group $G$. (You need a connection to define holonomy.) If $G$ is connected, the answer is certainly 'yes' as soon as $B$ has dimension $2$. In fact, in the connected case, you can take $B = \mathbb{R}^2$ and the generic connection on $G\times\mathbb{R^2}$ will have holonomy $G$. If $G$ is not connected, you have to work a little harder. More interesting are those $G$-bundles $P$ for which all the connections on $P$ have holonomy $G$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 9, 2014 at 16:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, that was exactly my question; and that was also the answer I needed, thanks! (I will edit the statement with your correction to make it more precise). $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 9, 2014 at 18:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RobertBryant: Do you have any nice examples of those $G$-bundles for which all the connections have full holonomy? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10, 2014 at 7:34
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @VítTuček: Sure. For example, any $S^1$-bundle over a compact manifold whose first Chern class is nontorsion has no connection whose holonomy is a proper subgroup of $S^1$. As another example, any $\mathrm{SU}(2)$-bundle $B$ over a compact manifold $M$ whose second Chern class cannot be written as the negative of a square of an element of $H^2(M,\mathbb{Z})$ cannot be given a connection whose holonomy is a proper subgroup of $\mathrm{SU}(2)$. In general, if the structure group of a principal $G$-bundle $B$ cannot be reduced, then the holonomy of any connection on $B$ must be all of $G$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10, 2014 at 12:28
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. I should have known this, since I read Theorem 11.7 of emis.de/monographs/KSM few months ago. :) $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10, 2014 at 15:15

1 Answer 1

16
$\begingroup$

As I mentioned in my comment, when $G$ is connected, you can do this with $B=\mathbb{R}^2$ and $P$ being the trivial bundle $P = G\times\mathbb{R}^2$.

Here is one construction: Let $\frak{g}$ be the Lie algebra of $G$ and let $\gamma:TG\to\frak{g}$ be the canonical left invariant, $\frak{g}$-valued $1$-form on $G$. Let $(r,\theta)$ be polar coordinates on $\mathbb{R}^2$, let $f = f(\theta):S^1\to\frak{g}$ be a curve such that there are values $\theta_1,\ldots,\theta_m$ such that the elements $f(\theta_i)$ for $1\le i\le m$ form a basis for $\frak{g}$ and such that $f'$ vanishes in an $\epsilon$-interval about each $\theta_i$ for some $\epsilon > 0$, and let $\rho=\rho(r)$ be a smooth, even function of $r$ that vanishes identically in a neighborhood of $r=0$ but has $\rho'(r)\equiv1$ for $r\ge1$. Now consider the connection form $$ \alpha= \gamma + \mathrm{Ad}(g^{-1})\bigl(\rho(r)f(\theta)d\theta\bigr), $$ where $g:P\to G$ is the projection onto the first factor. (When $G$ is a matrix group, this is just $\alpha = g^{-1}dg +g^{-1}\bigl(\rho(r)f(\theta)d\theta\bigr)g$.) Then I claim that the holonomy group of this connection is all of $G$.

Since $G$ is connected, it suffices to show that the Lie algebra of the holonomy group is all of $\frak{g}$ because, by Borel and Lichnerowicz, we know that the holonomy is a Lie subgroup of $G$. To do this, note that the given trivialization is is $\alpha$-parallel along each radial line through the origin $(r=0)$, since, along such a line, $d\theta=0$, implying that $\alpha = g^{-1}dg$ along such a line. On the other hand, because the curvature is $$ d\alpha + \tfrac12[\alpha,\alpha] = \mathrm{Ad}(g^{-1})\bigl(\rho'(r)f(\theta)\ dr\wedge d\theta\bigr), $$ one sees that, if one takes parallel translation starting at $\bigl(e,(0,0)\bigr)\in G\times\mathbb{R}^2=P$ above the curve that goes out along the radial path from $r=0$ to $r=1$ at angle $\theta_i$, goes counterclockwise around the box $[1,1{+}t]\times[\theta_i,\theta_i{+}\epsilon]$, and then returns to the origin ($r=0$) back along the initial radial path, then this will wind up at the point $\bigl(\exp(tf(\theta_i)),(0,0)\bigr)\in G\times\mathbb{R}^2=P$. (Moreover, $\alpha$-parallel translation of the curvature of $\alpha$ at $(1,\theta_i)$ back to the origin along the radial segment will yield a curvature that takes the value $f(\theta_i)$ at $\bigl(e,(0,0)\bigr)\in G\times\mathbb{R}^2=P$, so the Lie algebra of the holonomy group is all of $\frak{g}$.)

More directly, concatenating $m$ of these 'lassoes' about the points $(1,\theta_i)$ with appropriate values of $t$ will yield an $\alpha$-horizontal curve connecting $\bigl(e,(0,0)\bigr)\in P$ to the point $$ \bigl(\exp(t_1f(\theta_i))\cdots\exp(t_mf(\theta_m)),(0,0)\bigr)\in P. $$ Thus, one can reach an open set in the fiber over $(0,0)$ starting from $\bigl(e,(0,0)\bigr)\in P$ and traveling along $\alpha$-horizontal curves. Thus, since $G$ is connected, the holonomy of $\alpha$ is all of $G$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .