3
$\begingroup$

Years ago, my advisor showed me a construction where you take a CW complex and quotient each open cell to a single point. He said that under certain conditions (I believe always satisfied by the second barycentric subdivision of a complex) the resulting space would be a finite non-Hausdorff space homotopy equivalent to the original space.

Edit By 'homotopy equivalent' I really mean they have identical homotopy groups. I don't think this is equivalent to regular homotopy equivalence in the non-Hausdorff case.

He said this was well-known although not very popular. What is the name for this construction? What is a reference for the homotopy equivalence result?

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ One name to google for is that of Jonathan Barmak. In particular, he has a Springer LNM on the subject which should be very useful. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 20:08
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe this link will be helpful too: ncatlab.org/nlab/show/finite+topological+space $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 20:08
  • $\begingroup$ What happened to your advisor and why cannot you ask him/her? $\endgroup$
    – user6976
    Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 20:44
  • $\begingroup$ Jim Cannon retired and is composing music and writing a book. He answers e-mails but seems to be enjoying his retirement. He retired to get more time away from school duties and work on things he's behind on. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 20:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Here is an answer by Tom Goodwillie which gives an argument using van Kampen/excision: mathoverflow.net/questions/28380/… $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 21:03

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

When $K$ is a finite simplicial complex, this was done by Michael C. McCord ''Singular homology groups and homotopy groups of finite topological spaces'', Duke Math. J. 33 (1966), 465-474. If $X_K$ denotes the finite space you described, McCord proves that the quotient map $q:K \to X_K$ is a quasifibration in the sense of Dold and Thom, with contractible point-inverses. Thus $q$ is a weak homotopy equivalence and induces isomorphisms in singular homology.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Peter May has been running an REU course on finite topological spaces for a number of years. He has a bunch of material up, including a book in progress.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .