3
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a smooth degree $d$ $(d \ge 5)$ surface in $\mathbb{P}^3$. Let $D$ be an effective Cartier divisor (hence locally of complete intersection) on $X$ and $D_{red}$ the associated reduced scheme which is also a Cartier divisor on $X$. Then, we have a natural inclusion of ideal sheaves, $$0 \to \mathcal{O}_X(-D) \to \mathcal{O}_X(-D_{red}).$$

Taking the dual we have

$$\mathcal{O}_X(D_{red}) \to \mathcal{O}_X(D) \to 0.$$

Since, $\mathcal{O}_X(D_{red})$ and $\mathcal{O}_X(D)$ are locally free sheaves of rank $1$, this would imply that the kernel of the latter map is zero. This would imply that $\mathcal{O}_X(D_{red}) \cong \mathcal{O}_X(D)$. This result is very surprising. Is there a mistake in the proof or is there an explaination for this behaviour?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ There seems to be a problem with compilation of the math mode $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 8, 2012 at 12:35
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Use backtricks "`" around math asterisks. Regarding the mistake in your proof, recall that the derived functor of $Hom$ is $Ext$, so when you dualize at a certain point you have $Ext^1$ $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 8, 2012 at 13:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Regarding your question and Sandor's answer, note it has nothing to do with $X$ being a surface (of any degree) in $P^n$ $\endgroup$
    – meh
    Commented Oct 9, 2012 at 15:41

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

The second short exact sequence is wrong. You should recognize this without knowing where the mistake is: $D_{\mathrm{red}}\leq D$, so $\mathscr{O}_X(D_{\mathrm{red}}) \subseteq \mathscr{O}_X(D)$ and so the map you have is surjective if and only if $D_{\mathrm{red}}= D$. In fact that map is always injective as you discovered... The underlying point is that $\mathscr Hom$ is left exact, but not right exact.

The right computation would be that the dual of $$0 \to \mathscr{O}_X(-D) \to \mathscr{O}_X(-D_{red})\to \mathscr F \to 0.$$ gives $$0 \to \mathscr Hom_X(\mathscr F, \mathscr O_X) \to \mathscr{O}_X(D_{\mathrm{red}}) \to \mathscr{O}_X(D) \to \mathscr Ext^1_X(\mathscr F, \mathscr O_X)\to \mathscr Ext^1_X(\mathscr O_X(-D_{\mathrm{red}}), \mathscr O_X).$$

Now $\mathscr F$ is supported on $D$, so since $\mathscr O_X$ is torsion free $\mathscr Hom_X(\mathscr F, \mathscr O_X)=0$ and $\mathscr O_X(-D_{\mathrm{red}})$ is locally free, so $\mathscr Ext^1_X(\mathscr O_X(-D_{\mathrm{red}}), \mathscr O_X)=0$ and hence you have a short exact sequence: $$0 \to \mathscr{O}_X(D_{\mathrm{red}}) \to \mathscr{O}_X(D) \to \mathscr Ext^1_X(\mathscr F, \mathscr O_X)\to 0.$$

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .