4
$\begingroup$

One can make a model of the hyperbolic plane inside the Euclidean plane, either using the conformal model or projective model.

How does one make a model of the Euclidean plane inside the hyperbolic plane?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ math.SE duplicate! math.stackexchange.com/questions/1347/… $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 16:20
  • $\begingroup$ There are infinitely many diffeomorphisms from the Euclidean plane to an open subset of the hyperbolic plane. You'd want to find a diffeomorphism with some nice property, to distinguish it from this enormous family. An obvious choice is to find a conformal mapping, but by Liouville's theorem there is none. Why do you want such a map? Is there any property you would like it to have? $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 16:25
  • $\begingroup$ I want to know what are the lines in the geometry, how to compute distance and angle.. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 17:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What algebraic structure would you place on $\mathbb H^2$? $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 20:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There's the tangent space to a point in hyperbolic space. That's Euclidean. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 20:42

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

I believe there is no good model of $\mathbb{E}^2$ in $\mathbb{H}^2.$ However, there is an excellent model in $\mathbb{H}^3:$ any horosphere will work.

Also This is not particularly interesting, but if you use the hyperboloid model of $\mathbb{H}^2,$ you can project it (from, e.g., the point $(2, 0, 0)$ onto the $(x, y)$ plane. This will give an algebraic model of $\mathbb{E}^2$ in $\mathbb{H}^2.$

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Yes I know that. That's why I want the smaller dimension. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 17:11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Look at the Also. $\endgroup$
    – Igor Rivin
    Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 17:47
  • $\begingroup$ @Igor How do I see triangles have 180 degrees? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 18:09
  • $\begingroup$ The $(x, y)$ plane is a Euclidean plane? $\endgroup$
    – Igor Rivin
    Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 19:21
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Hyperboloid is a graph over the xy plane. $\endgroup$
    – Deane Yang
    Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 22:40
0
$\begingroup$

This is a response to Will Sawin's comment "What algebraic structure would you place on $\mathbb{H}^2$?"

On $\mathbb{R}^n$ there is a vector space structure where

1) The metric is given by $d(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v})=\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|$

and

2) given three points $U,V,W$ the angle $U\hat WV$ satisfies $\cos \theta = \frac{(-W+U)\cdot(-W+V)}{\|-W+U\|\|-W+V\|}$

Analogously, for some models of $\mathbb{H}^n$ with points identified with a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ there is a vector-like structure but with a noncommutative, nonassociative binary operation $\oplus$ where

1) The metric is given by $d(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v})=\|\mathbf{u} \ominus \mathbf{v} \| $

and

2) given three points $U,V,W$ the angle $U\hat WV$ satisfies $\cos \theta = \frac{(\ominus W\oplus U)\cdot(\ominus W\oplus V)}{\|\ominus W\oplus U\|\|\ominus W\oplus V\|}$

$\| \|$ and $\cdot $ are the vector norm and dot product inherited from $\mathbb{R}^n$.

$\ominus a$ denotes the left inverse of a.

$a\ominus b$ denotes $a\oplus (\ominus b)$.

Note the use of the trig function "cos" even though this hyperbolic geometry.

For the Beltrami-Klein model the binary operation $\oplus$ is given by the formula for relativistic velocity-addition.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .