1
$\begingroup$

Suppose X, Y, Z are k-varieties and $f: X \to Z$ factors through $f': X \to Y$ and $g: Y \to Z$. Suppose all of f, f', g are surjective. Assume that for $z \in Z$, the fibre $f^{-1} (z)$ is reduced. Then, is the fibre $g^{-1} (z)$ always reduced?

If not, when will it be true?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Counterexample: $Spec k \to Spec k[X]/(X^2) \to Spec k$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 23, 2010 at 19:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry for being imprecise. Here $k$-varieties mean, integral $k$-schemes of finite type over $k$, where the middle scheme isn't probably fitting into the case. Do you know any other example where X, Y, Z are all k-varieties? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 23, 2010 at 19:53

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

How about: $Y$ is the cubic curve $y^2=x^2+x^3$ in $\mathbb A^2$ minus the point $(-1,0)$, $g:Y\to Z$ is the projection to the $x$-axis, and $X$ is the normalization of $Y$, which would be $\mathbb P^1$ minus 2 points.

The fiber $g^{-1}(0)$ is one non-reduced point. The fiber $f^{-1}(0)$ is two reduced points.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Nice example! We can notice that here $X\to Y$ is not flat (a normalization map is never flat unless it is an isomorphism). $\endgroup$
    – Qing Liu
    Commented Jan 24, 2010 at 16:33
5
$\begingroup$

The fiber $X_z$ is equal to $X\times_Y Y_z$. So if $X\to Y$ is faithfully flat, then $X_z$ reduced implies that $Y_z$ is reduced.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .