I am interested in presentations of the group $SL_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ (and eventually $SL_n(\mathbb{F}_q[t])$).
The standard "Chevalley" presentation of $SL_n(R)$ for a ring $R$ has generators $\{x_{i,j}(r) : i \neq j \in [n], r \in R\}$ and three types of relations:
- Linearity relations, $x_{i,j}(t) x_{i,j}(u) = x_{i,j}(t+u)$.
- Commutator relations, $[x_{i,j}(t),x_{j,k}(u)] = x_{i,k}(tu)$ (for $k \neq i$) and $[x_{i,j}(t),x_{k,\ell}(u)] = 1$ (for $i,j,k,\ell$ all distinct).
- "Diagonal" relations, $h_{i,j}(t) h_{i,j}(u) = h_{i,j}(tu)$ where $h_{i,j}(t) := g_{i,j}(t) g_{i,j}(-1)$ and $g_{i,j} := x_{i,j}(t) x_{j,i}(-t^{-1}) x_{i,j}(t)$ (only defined when $t,u$ are invertible).
There is a related "Steinberg" group which is defined only by the relation sets (1) and (2). According to the following paper:
S. Splitthoff, “Finite presentability of Steinberg groups and related Chevalley groups,” in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 55.2, S. J. Bloch, R. K. Dennis, E. M. Friedlander, and M. R. Stein, Eds., Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 1986, pp. 635–687. doi: 10.1090/conm/055.2/1862658.
for the cases $R=\mathbb{F}_q[t]$ and $R = \mathbb{F}_q$, the Steinberg and Chevalley groups coincide. (Actually, the former was the result of this paper, the latter was apparently already known.)
Splitthoff phrases these results as the triviality of the "$K_2$ group" for these rings ($K_2(R)$ being defined as the kernel of the surjective map of the Steinberg group onto the Chevalley group over $R$). However, I know absolutely nothing about $K$-theory, and my Googling is not looking promising. Is there any 'elementary' way to see that the diagonal relations are derivable from the linearity and commutator relations over these rings, or must one go learn some more theory?