3
$\begingroup$

Suppose I have a $n\times n$-symmetric positive-definite matrix $A$ with elements:
\begin{align} [A]_{ij}=\int_{\Omega}f_i(x)f_j(x) \, dx, \quad i,j=1,\ldots,n \end{align} where $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ is a bounded domain with $\int_\Omega dx=1$ and $f_i:\Omega\to \mathbb{R}$ are continuous functions.

Suppose now that we sample $N$ points $(x_k)_{k=1}^N$ in $\Omega$ uniformly and create the matrix $A_N$ with elements $$ [A_N]_{ij}=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{k=1}^N f_i(x_k)f_j(x_k) $$

Thus, each element in $A_N$ is a Monte-Carlo estimate of the corresponding element in $A$.

Question: I would like to show that, given a vector $v\in \mathbb{R}^n$, we have that \begin{align} |v^T(A^{-1}-A_N^{-1})v|\leq C v^TA^{-1}v, \quad \text{$C$ a constant prefferably independent of $n,N, v$} \end{align} with at least probability $p$ which depends on $N$ and possibly $n$.

I want an expression for the probability $p$, and if possible, the expression would be of the form $p=1-\exp(-cN)$.

I would appreciate any thoughts/references relevant to this kind of problem. Thanks!

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean, precisely, by " high probability" here? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 9 at 12:42
  • $\begingroup$ Hi! Sorry about being to vague. But I would like to show that the given bound holds with at least a probability $p$, where the expression for $p$ depends on $N$ and possibly $n$. A desirable expression would be something like $p\sim 1-exp(-cN)$ so that $p$ goes to $0$ fast with N. I don't know if that's possible to show, but Im interested in that kind of results. $\endgroup$
    – Jjj
    Commented Oct 9 at 12:59

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\Om}{\Omega}\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb R}\newcommand{\de}{\delta}\newcommand{\De}{\Delta}$The question makes sense only if $A^{-1}$ exists, which will be assumed in what follows. For $x\in\Om$, let $f(x):=[f_1(x),\ldots,f_n(x)]^\top$, so that $f$ is a random vector in $\R^n$ defined on the probability space $(\Om,P)$, where $P$ is the Lebesgue measure over $\Om$, and $Eff^\top=A=EA_N$. We will assume that the vector function $f$ can be continuously extended to the closure of $\Om$.

Let $g:=A^{-1/2}f$. Then $Egg^\top=I_n$, where $I_n$ is the $n\times n$ identity matrix, and \begin{equation*} A_N=A^{1/2}B_N A^{1/2}, \end{equation*} where \begin{equation*} B_N:=\frac1N\,\sum_{k=1}^N X_k \tag{0}\label{0} \end{equation*} and $X_k$ is the $n\times n$ random matrix with entries $(X_k)_{ij}=g_i(x_k)g_j(x_k)$ for $i,j=1,\dots,n$.

So, considering $w:=A^{-1/2}v$, rewrite your condition $|v^T(A^{-1}-A_N^{-1})v|\leq C v^TA^{-1}v$ as \begin{equation*} \|B_N^{-1}-I_n\|\le C, \tag{10}\label{10} \end{equation*} where $\|\cdot\|$ is the spectral matrix norm. Letting \begin{equation*} \De_N:=B_N-I_n, \end{equation*} we have $B_N^{-1}-I_n=-B_N^{-1}\De_N$ and hence $\|B_N^{-1}-I_n\|\le\|B_N^{-1}\|\,\|\De_N\|$. Moreover, if $\|\De_N\|<1$, then \begin{equation*} B_N^{-1}=(I_n+\De_N)^{-1}=I_n-\De_N+\De_N^2-\cdots \end{equation*} and hence \begin{equation*} \|B_N^{-1}\|\le1+\|\De_N\|+\|\De_N\|^2+\cdots=\frac1{1-\|\De_N\|}. \end{equation*} So, $\|B_N^{-1}-I_n\|\le\|B_N^{-1}\|\,\|\De_N\|\le\frac{\|\De_N\|}{1-\|\De_N\|}$, and therefore \eqref{10} is implied by \begin{equation*} \|\De_N\|\le\de:=\frac C{1+C}. \tag{20}\label{20} \end{equation*}

It remains to show that inequality \eqref{20} happens "with high probability". Toward this end, note that $X_1,\dots,X_N$ are i.i.d. random matrices such that $EX_k=I_n$ and $\|X_k-I_n\|\le M$ for some real $M>0$ (because of the assumption that $f$ can be continuously extended to the closure of $\Om$). So, by Theorem 3.4 with $a=M$, $b=M\sqrt{N}$, $D=1$, and $r=N\de$, we have \begin{equation} P(\|\De_N\|\ge\de) =P\Big(\Big\|\frac1N\,\sum_{k=1}^N (X_k-EX_k)\Big\|\ge\de\Big) \le2\exp(-N\psi(\de/M)), \end{equation} where $\psi(u):=-u+(u+1)\ln(u+1)>0$ for real $u>0$ (and $\psi(u)\sim u^2/2$ as $u\to0$).

Thus, inequality \eqref{20} does happen with "high probability" $\ge1-2\exp(-N\psi(\de/M))$ (which does not directly depend on $n$ or $d$). $\quad\Box$.

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for your very good explanation, I really appreciate it :) I understand your derivation, until you state that $\|X_k-I_n\|\leq M$ follows by the assumption that all $f_i(x)$ can be extended to be continuous on the closure of $\Omega$, how can that be shown? Also, I guess the constant $M$ will depend on the dimension $n$? Can one say anything about this dependence? After some thoughts, Im after some expression like $1-exp(- c N/n)$ for the probability. So by making $N$ much larger than $n$ we make the probability close to 1. Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Jjj
    Commented Oct 10 at 18:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Erling : Since the vector function $f$ can be continuously extended to the closure of the bounded domain $\Omega$, we have $\|f\|:=\sup_{x\in\Omega}|f(x)|\le b$ for some real $b>0$; here, $|\cdot|$ is the Euclidean norm on $\Bbb R^n$. Since $g=A^{-1/2}f$ and $X_k=g(x_k)g(x_k)^\top$, we have $\|X_k\|\le\|g\|^2\le(\|A^{-1/2}\|\,\|f\|)^2\le\|A^{-1/2}\|^2\,b^2=:M_0<\infty$, where $\|A^{-1/2}\|$ is the spectral norm of the matrix $A^{-1/2}$. So, $\|X_k-I_n\|\le M:=M_0+1=\|A^{-1/2}\|^2\,b^2+1$. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 10 at 19:45
  • $\begingroup$ Previous comment continued: We see that, naturally, $M$ will be large if $A$ is close to being singular and/or if $|f_i|$'s may take large values. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 10 at 19:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Erling : Do you have a further response to my answer and comment? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 11 at 13:22
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for your answer. I know that the functions $f_i$ are bounded so thats not a problem. However, Im still wondering the dependency of $n$. Its seems reasonable to get some expression like $N/n$ in the exponent. $\endgroup$
    – Jjj
    Commented Oct 11 at 17:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .