2
$\begingroup$

Let $U$ and $V$ be connected open subsets of $\mathbb R^2$. Let $f$ be a smooth map from $U$ onto $V$ such that the Jacobian determinant of $f$ is nonzero everywhere. Does it then necessarily follow that $f$ is a bijection?


Counterexamples are easy to find if we allow $V$ to be contained in a bigger space, say $\mathbb R^3$; or if we relax enough the conditions on the smoothness and the Jacobian determinant of $f$.


I apologize in advance if this question is trivial. I have no background in differential topology (and am not even quite sure that this question belongs in differential topology).



As was noted in a comment by Moishe Kohan, the answer to this question follows from the previous answers. However, to make a bridge from those answers to an answer to this question, one needs to recall and use the Great Picard Theorem (which I, shamefully, forgot about). Also, now we have, not only the excellent answer by Alexandre Eremenko, but also a completely elementary answer, which I think shows in what specific manner the non-bijectivity can occur. For these reasons, I'd prefer that this question be kept.

Edit: In view of the discussion of the answer by Alexandre Eremenko, let me add here the condition for $U$ and $V$ to be simply connected. A further question would then be whether the thickness parameter $\epsilon$ in the answer by Qfwfq can be chosen so that $V$ be simply connected.

$\endgroup$
0

4 Answers 4

8
$\begingroup$

No. Let $C$ be the complex plane, $U=V=C\backslash\{0\}$. Transformation $z\mapsto z^2$ is smooth and has non-zero Jacobian $4|z|^2$ but it is not a bijection.

The question in the comments: no. Take $U=\{ z\in C\backslash\{0\}:|\arg z|<2\pi/3\}$, and the same $f$.

Second question in the comments: again the answer is no. Take $f(z)=\int_0^z e^{\zeta^2}d\zeta$, and $U=V=C$. The map is surjective, every point has infinitely many perimages, and the Jacobian is $|f'|^2=\exp2(\Re z^2)\neq 0$. To see that the map is surjective, notice that it is an entire function of order 2. If an entire function of order two omits a complex value $a$, then it has the form $f(z)=a+e^{P(z)},$ where $P$ is a polynomial of degree 2. This is of course not the case for our function. Similarly, if the value $a$ is taken finitely many times, then $f(z)=a+Q(z)s^{P(z)}$. So our function takes every value infinitely many times.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. I should have thought a bit more. Will the answer change if we also assume that $U$ is simply connected? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2020 at 14:38
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you again. What if we assume that both $U$ and $V$ are simply connected? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2020 at 14:48
  • $\begingroup$ All right. How can I see that the latest map is surjective and every point has infinitely many preimages? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2020 at 15:40
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This is a truly amazing example I did not know. All my life I was sure that a surjectivve local diffeomorphism of $\mathbb{R}^n$ must be a covering map and hence a diffeomorphism. First I wrote an incorrect answer and only after I saw yours I added "proper". $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 5, 2020 at 18:37
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexandreEremenko : Thank you for your patience and the excellent answer. (I think the expression for $|f'|^2$ should also involve $\Im z$.) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 12:29
3
$\begingroup$

Here is an elementary answer, which shows how the bijectivity of $f$ may be violated, even when $U$ and $V$ are both simply connected domains (and $f\colon U\to V$ is a smooth surjection with the Jacobian determinant nonzero everywhere).

The idea is very simple: First of all, it is easy to get a smooth non-bijective map, say $f_1$, from a simply connected open set $U_1\subseteq\mathbb R^2$ to a simply connected open set $V\subseteq\mathbb R^2$ with the Jacobian determinant of $f_1$ nonzero everywhere and one point in $V$ missing from the image $f_1(U_1)$. The idea then is just to extend $f_1$ to a map $f\colon U\to V$ in order to smear over the missing point -- keeping, for $f$, the smoothness and nonzero Jacobian determinant properties. Below, the smear is represented by the function $f_2$, which extends the function $f_1$ to $f$ (while the image set of $f_1$ misses a point in $V$).

Let $U:=(0,1)\times(0,4\pi+\pi/2)$ and $V:=D$, the open unit disk. For $(r,t)\in U$, let $$f(r,t):= \begin{cases} f_1(r,t) & \text{ if}\quad 0<t\le2\pi, \\ f_2(r,t) & \text{ if}\quad 2\pi<t<4\pi+\pi/2, \end{cases} $$ where $$f_1(r,t):=r\,(\cos t,\sin t),$$ $$f_2(r,t):=(-2a(t),0)+(a(t) + r (1 - 4 a(t))) \,(\cos t,\sin t),$$ and $$a(t):=\frac14\, \exp\Big(-\frac\pi{t - 2\pi}\Big).$$

Shown below are the (properly shaded) "parametric plots", that is, the sets $S_1:=\{f_1(r,t)\colon 0<r<1,0<t\le2\pi\}$ (left), $S_2:=\{f_2(r,t)\colon 0<r<1,2\pi<t\le4\pi+\pi/2\}$ (right), as well as both of these two sets superimposed together, forming the set $S:=f(U)=S_1\cup S_2=\{f(r,t)\colon 0<r<1,0<t<4\pi+\pi/2\}$.

enter image description here

enter image description here

It is not hard to see that the map $f$ is smooth and the Jacobian determinant of $f$ is nonzero (actually, $>0$) everywhere.

It is also easy to see that $S\subseteq D=V$, $S_1=D\setminus\{(0,0)\}$, whereas $f(r_*,4\pi)=f_2(r_*,4\pi)=(0,0)$, where $r_*:=1/(4 (\sqrt e-1))=0.385\dots$. So, $f$ is surjective.

However, as seen from the pictures, $f$ is not bijective. Formally, for instance, $f(r-(r+1/4)/\sqrt e,2\pi)=f(r,4\pi)$ for all $r\in(r_*,1)$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ This is a very nice example. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 12:20
  • $\begingroup$ May I ask what in your counterexample violates the assumptions for the Hadamard-Cacciappoli Theorem as stated in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffeomorphism? I can't figure out. $\endgroup$
    – jens
    Commented Jun 7, 2023 at 17:23
  • $\begingroup$ I am not familiar with the proof of that theorem. I would guess that the map in my example is not proper in the sense used in that theorem. You are welcome to check that. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 7, 2023 at 17:46
  • $\begingroup$ I couldn't find an accessible proof. It seems clear to me that your function is proper since compact sets in the codomain have compact preimages (nothing escapes to infinity). So that shouldn't be the issue. I suspect, however, that your counterexample is not smooth at the transition between both parts of the curve, at $t=2\pi$. Could that be the issue? On the other hand, the existence of the bump function (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoothness) gives me some confidence that your counterexample could be made smooth. So, I am still puzzled. $\endgroup$
    – jens
    Commented Jun 8, 2023 at 8:47
2
$\begingroup$

As Alexandre Eremenko pointed out, in general the answer is in the negative. However, in a comment the OP asked a modified question:

What if we assume that both $U$ and $V$ are simply connected?

The following result is in a positive direction:

If, $V$ is simply connected and $U$ is connected, and $f$ is proper (i.e. preimages of compact sets are compact), then then $f$ is a bijection.

Under the given assumptions $f$ is a covering map, see https://math.stackexchange.com/q/860351/798404

A covering space is a universal covering space if it is simply connected. Assuming that $V$ is simply connected, it is its universal cover and $\operatorname{id}:V\to V$ is a covering map. Now we use the fact:

If the mapping $p: D \to X$ is a universal cover of the space $X$ and the mapping $f : C \to X$ is any cover of the space $X$ where the covering space $C$ is connected, then there exists a covering map $g : D \to C$ such that $f ∘ g = p$.

In our situation $D=X=V$, $p=\operatorname{id}$, $C=U$ and $f$ is $f$. Therefore there is $g:D\to C$ i.e. $g:V\to U$ such that $f\circ g=p$ i.e., $f\circ g=\operatorname{id}$. That proves that $f$ is a bijection (and hence a diffeomorphism).

You can find basic statements about universal cover and covering maps in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covering_space#Lifting_properties

If you want to learn more, take almost any book in topology. For example:

M. A. Armstrong, Basic Topology.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. Can you give a proof of this? This would appear to contradict the last part of Alexandre Eremenko's answer (with $f(z)=\int_0^z e^{w^2}dw$), which my plotting suggests is correct -- but I don't know how to prove that. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2020 at 21:53
  • $\begingroup$ @IosifPinelis I had to modify my answer by adding the assumption that the map is proper. I also sketched a proof. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2020 at 22:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Iosif Pinelis: the key word in this answer is "proper". Of course my example is not proper. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 5, 2020 at 14:13
  • $\begingroup$ @PiotrHajlasz : Thank you again for your answer. In the elementary counterexample that I now have, it is easy to find a compact set with a non-compact preimage. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 4:09
1
$\begingroup$

Another trivial counterexample.

Consider the rational parametrization of the real nodal plane cubic curve $y^2=x^2(x+1)$:

$$\gamma:t\mapsto (t^2-1,t(t^2-1))\;.$$

We have $\dot{\gamma}(t)=(2t,3t^2-1)$. Consider a normal $\nu(t)=(1-3t^2,2t)$.

enter image description here (image from Wikipedia)

A "thickening"

$$F:(t,s)\mapsto\gamma(t)+s\nu(t)$$

will do, for example restricting to $U=(-3/2,3/2)\times(-\epsilon,\epsilon)$, $V=F(U)\subseteq\mathbb{R}^2$, for $\epsilon<<1$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for this answer. I thought about cubic curves. However, this will not work for small $\epsilon$, as you seem to be suggesting -- because then $F(U)$ will not be simply connected. It will not work for large $\epsilon$ either -- because then the Jacobian determinant of $F$ will not be nonzero everywhere. I don't know if there is a working middle range of values of $\epsilon$. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 18:44
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, this is literally an answer to your question (you mention "connected open subsets"), not to the more interesting version where $U$ and $V$ are simply connected which you asked in the comments to another answer. $\endgroup$
    – Qfwfq
    Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 19:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .