16
$\begingroup$

I am interested in the low-degree stable homotopy group $\pi_2^{s}(X)$ of a path-connected space $X$. Using the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence, we have the short exact sequence $0\to H_1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2)\to \pi_2^{s}(X)\to H_2(X,\mathbb{Z})\to 0$.

Question: Does it always split?


Edit: I've been working on a solution to my question, and I believe I've made progress. However, I've hit a roadblock in the proof and I'm hoping for some assistance. I will award the best answer to whoever can help me finish my proof or provide insight into my original question.

I think my exact sequence splits canonically! My idea is to show the following dual exact sequence splits canonically: $$ 0\to H^2(X,\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z})\to\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathbb{Z}}(\pi_2^s(X),\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z})\stackrel{h}{\to} H^1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2)\to 0, $$ where I use the canonical isomorphism $\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathbb{Z}}(H_1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2),\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z})\cong H^1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2)$. Next, I define $\phi$ as the generator of $\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathbb{Z}}(\pi^s_2(K(\mathbb{Z}/2,1)),\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z})\simeq\mathbb{Z}/2$. For each $f\in H^1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2)\cong[X,K(\mathbb{Z}/2,1)]$, I consider the pullback $f^*\phi\in\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathbb{Z}}(\pi^s_2(X),\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z})$. This defines a map $[\phi]:H^1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2)\mapsto\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathbb{Z}}(\pi^s_2(X),\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z})$ that sends $f$ to $f^*\phi$.

I'm tempted to believe that $[\phi]$ is a homomorphism and $[\phi]\circ h=\mathrm{id}_{H^1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2)}$, but I cannot come up with a proof. If you have any insights into this, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you!


Edit2 I’m really happy to see some of you enjoyed this question! Then what’s left for myself is to figure out how my argument fails, especially the naturality part.

$\endgroup$
8
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I think it's better to post a question to just one of mathoverflow and math.stackexchange, not to both at the same time: math.stackexchange.com/questions/4661599/…. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 18, 2023 at 16:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Here's a small observation: For a $1$-connective spectrum, the corresponding sequence does not necessarily split, as can be seen by attaching a $3$-cell to $\mathbb{S}^1\oplus \mathbb{S}^2$ along $(\eta,2)$. So if this holds for spaces, it is an unstable phenomenon, so the Adams spectral sequence is probably not helpful (on its own). $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 18, 2023 at 19:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AchimKrause what happens if you attach a 3-cell to $\Omega S^2 \wedge S^2$ by $(h, 2)$ where "h" is the adjoint of the hopf map. This is an unstable analog of what you suggest. Does it split in this case? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 19, 2023 at 18:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ChrisSchommer-Pries, I presume your $\wedge$ is a $\vee$. Unfortunately, the suspension of $h$ splits, using the James splitting and the observation that the Hopf invariant of $\eta$ is $1$. So the suspension spectrum of the cofiber of $S^2\to \Omega S^2\vee S^2$ just splits into a bunch of spheres. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 19, 2023 at 20:18
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I do not think that your proposed splitting map can be a homomorphism, because there cannot be a natural splitting. If there were, then the map $A\hat{\otimes }A\to A\wedge A$ in Fernando Muro's answer would have a natural right inverse $s$ that is a homomorphism. But by universal example one can work out what the natural maps $t:A\hat A\to A\hat{\otimes }A$ are, and none of them does the job. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2023 at 10:27

1 Answer 1

11
$\begingroup$

I love this question! I've enjoyed thinking of it. Below, I show why the sequence splits always.

Let $X\to Y=K(H_1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2),1)$ be the map inducing the identity in $H_1(-,\mathbb{Z}/2)$. By naturality, we have have a commutative diagram $$ \begin{array}{cccccccc} 0&\to& H_1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2)&\to& \pi_2^{st}(X)&\to&H_2(X,\mathbb{Z})&\to&0 \\ \downarrow&&\cong\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\\ 0&\to& H_1(Y,\mathbb{Z}/2)&\to& \pi_2^{st}(Y)&\to&H_2(Y,\mathbb{Z})&\to&0 \end{array} $$ Hence, if the bottom sequence splits, the upper one too.

Let $A=H_1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2)$. We have another commutative diagram where all vertical maps are isomorphisms: $$ \begin{array}{cccccccc} 0&\to& A\otimes \mathbb{Z}/2&\to& A\hat{\otimes} A&\to&A\wedge A&\to&0\\ \downarrow&&\cong\downarrow&&\cong\downarrow&&\cong\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\\ 0&\to& H_1(Y,\mathbb{Z}/2)&\to& \pi_2^{st}(Y)&\to&H_2(Y,\mathbb{Z})&\to&0 \end{array} $$ Here $A\hat{\otimes}A$ and $A\wedge A$ are the quotients of $A\otimes A$ by the relations $a\otimes b+b\otimes a=0$, $a,b\in A$, in the first case, and $a\otimes a=0$, $a\in A$, in the second case. The morphism $A\otimes \mathbb{Z}/2\to A\hat{\otimes} A$ is given by $a\otimes 1\mapsto [a\otimes a]$. This actually holds for any $Y=K(A,1)$ with $A$ abelian. See:

Brown, Ronald; Loday, Jean-Louis Van Kampen theorems for diagrams of spaces. With an appendix by M. Zisman. Topology 26 (1987), no. 3, 311–335. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0040938387900048?via%3Dihub

The top sequence in the second commutative diagram splits because $A=H_1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2)$, so it is a short exact sequence of $\mathbb{Z}/2$-vector spaces.

We can also proceed without using the Brown-Loday paper, as hinted below by Tom Goodwillie in a comment. It suffices to show that $\pi_2^{st}(Y)$ is a $\mathbb{Z}/2$-vector space. We have $\pi_2^{st}(Y)=\pi_4(\Sigma^2Y)$ since $Y$ is connected. The space $Y$ is a product of copies of $\mathbb{R}P^\infty$. By the splitting of the suspension of a product, $\Sigma^2 Y$ is a wedge of copies of $\Sigma^2(\mathbb{R}P^\infty\wedge\stackrel{n}\cdots\wedge\mathbb{R}P^\infty)$. The latter space is $4$-connected for $n>2$, hence $\pi_2^{st}(Y)$ is a direct sum of copies of $\pi_4\Sigma^2\mathbb{R}P^\infty=\mathbb{Z}/2$ and $\pi_4\Sigma^2(\mathbb{R}P^\infty\wedge\mathbb{R}P^\infty)=\mathbb{Z}/2$.

P.S. A previous version of this answer contained a partial proof. The argument was similar, but this final version is even simpler.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ After your edition, some crucial information that was in original version is missing so that it is impossible to follow the proof... $\endgroup$
    – user43326
    Commented Mar 21, 2023 at 8:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DaveBenson thx! Fixed. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2023 at 9:38
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I enjoyed the question, too, and the answer. Let me point out a further simplification: you do not need the Brown-Loday reference if you observe that $\pi_2^S(K(A,1))$ is a $\mathbb Z/2$-vector space whenever $A$ is a $\mathbb Z/2$-vector space. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2023 at 10:15
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Note that the splitting isn't natural, even when restricted to spaces $X$ of the form $K(A,1)$ with $A$ a $\mathbb Z/2$ vector space. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2023 at 14:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Fernando Muro of course, please do. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2023 at 17:18

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .