3
$\begingroup$

I am trying to better understand the straightening-unstraightening equivalence of Lurie in the $\infty$-categorical setting. In the case that I am interested in, this equivalence states that $$ \mathrm{LFib}(\mathcal{C}) \simeq \mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}, \mathrm{Spaces}), $$ where $\mathcal{C}$ is an $\infty$-category and $\mathrm{LFib}(\mathcal{C})$ is some $\infty$-subcategory of $(\mathrm{Cat}_\infty)_{/\mathcal{C}}$ spanned by the left fibrations with codomain $\mathcal{C}$. What I don't understand and can't quite find in the literature is whether the morphisms in $\mathrm{LFib}(\mathcal{C})$, which I take to be functors $\mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{E}$ sitting over $\mathcal{C}$, are themselves left fibrations. I.e., if I have a natural transformation $\eta : D \to E$ of functors $D, E : \mathcal{C} \to \mathrm{Spaces}$, does it straighten to a left fibration $\mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{E}$ between the straightenings of $D$ and $E$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The answer is yes, but $\mathrm{LFib}(\mathcal C)$ is also the full subcategory of $(\mathrm{Cat}_\infty)_{/\mathcal C}$, it just so happens that you can prove that any morphism between such is a left fibration (this does not remain true in the case of cocartesian fibrations, though).

Here is a proof: Let $f:\mathcal{D\to E}$ be a morphism of left fibrations over $\mathcal C$, which I'll denote by $p,q$ respectively. By the dual of HTT.2.4.1.3.(3), if an edge $\alpha$ in $\mathcal D$ is such that $f(\alpha)$ is $q$-coCartesian, then $\alpha$ is $f$-coCartesian if and only if it is $p$-coCartesian.

But we are in left fibrations, so all edges are $p$-coCartesian. In particular, $\alpha$ is $f$-coCartesian if and only if $f(\alpha)$ is $q$-coCartesian, the latter being a void condition: every edge is $f$-coCartesian.

So we have seen that any edge is $f$-coCartesian, and therefore we just need a sufficient supply of (arbitrary) edges along $f$: let $\alpha: e_0\to e_1$ be an edge in $\mathcal E$, with a lift $d_0$ of $e_0$ along $f$, i.e. $f(d_0) = e_0$. We then push things down: $q(\alpha): q(e_0) \to q(e_1)$ is an edge in $\mathcal C$, with source $q(e_0) = p(d_0)$, so it has a lift $\tilde \alpha: d_0\to d_1$. Now $f(\tilde\alpha): f(d_0)\to f(d_1)$ is some map lifting $q(\alpha)$, and it is $q$-coCartesian, just like $\alpha$ (and any map in $\mathcal E$), so there is an equivalence $e_1\simeq f(d_1)$ with appropriate $2$-simplices showing that have found a lift of $\alpha$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ This is great, thanks! In the very last argument you are using (the dual to) HTT 2.4.2.4, right? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 22:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LorenzoRiva it depends what exactly you mean by "the very last argument", but yes, 2.4.2.4. was definitely implicit in a lot of what I wrote ! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 23, 2023 at 10:50
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, one more (probably obvious) thing - how do I show that $f$ is an inner fibration, which I need to apply 2.4.2.4? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 4:44
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think it is in general, but "inner fibration" is not a homotopical notion : any functor can be replaced, up to equivalence, by an inner fibration. I wrote this answer in terms of $\infty$-categories, not in terms of quasicategories. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 8:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .