4
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be a commutative ring, and $M$ be an $A$-module, and $M^*$ be $\mathrm{Hom}_A(M,A)$. Let $f$ be the map from $M \otimes_A M^*$ to $\mathrm{Hom}_A(M,M)$, such that, for all $x=\sum_i a_i \otimes b_i \in M \otimes_A M^*$, $f(x)$ is the homomorphism $y \in M \mapsto \sum_ib_i(y)a_i \in M$. Is it true that $f$ is always a monomorphism ? If not, is there a necessary and sufficient condition on $M$ for $f$ to be a monomorphism ?

$\endgroup$
7
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It is a classical result that the mentioned map is a bijection if and only if $M$ is finitely generated and projective (fgp), so being fgp is a sufficient condition. But I believe we can weaken it to the module $M$ being merely projective. $\endgroup$
    – Sampah
    Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 15:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, if $M$ is projective, $f$ is a monomorphism, but the reverse is not true. For example, if $A=\mathbb{Z}$ and $M=\mathbb{Z}/n \mathbb{Z}$, then $M^*=0$, so $M \otimes M^*=0$, so $f$ is injective, but $M$ is not a projective module. $\endgroup$
    – marco2013
    Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 16:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BenjaminSteinberg Maybe I misunderstood your comment, but you are saying that $f$ is always injective? I doubt that. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 20:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I also highly doubt that this is sufficient. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 20:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MartinBrandenburg, maybe it isn't. I'm used to finite dimensional algebras $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 20:50

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

Here is how I would start.

Let $S$ be the class of all pairs of $A$-modules $(M,N)$ such that the canonical map $$M \otimes N^* \to \hom(N,M), ~ m \otimes \omega \mapsto (n \mapsto \omega(n) \cdot m)$$ is a monomorphism. Both sides are additive functors in both variables. It follows formally that $S$ is closed under finite direct sums (in both variables) as well as under direct summands (in both variables).

Clearly, $(A,N) \in S$ and $(M,A) \in S$. It follows that $(M,N) \in S$ whenever $M$ and $N$ are finitely generated and projective (in which case the map is actually an isomorphism).

We can also prove that $S$ is closed under infinite direct sums in the first variable: Let $I$ be any index set and $(M_i,N) \in S$ for $i \in I$, then $(\bigoplus_{i \in I} M_i,N) \in S$: This is because the map $$\textstyle (\bigoplus_{i \in I} M_i) \otimes N \to \hom(N,\bigoplus_{i \in I} M_i)$$ is mono iff the composition $$\textstyle (\bigoplus_{i \in I} M_i) \otimes N \to \hom(N,\bigoplus_{i \in I} M_i) \hookrightarrow \hom(N,\prod_{i \in I} M_i)$$ is mono, which identifies with the mono $$\textstyle \bigoplus_i (M_i \otimes N) \hookrightarrow \bigoplus_{i \in I} \hom(N,M_i) \hookrightarrow \prod_{i \in I} \hom(N,M_i).$$

In particular $(M,N) \in S$ whenever $M$ is a free module, and hence also when $M$ is a projective module. (This special case has been mentioned in the comments already, but I wanted to show a conceptual proof.)

Remark: $S$ is not closed under infinite direct sums in the second variable. In fact, it can happen that $M \otimes A^I \to M^I$ is not a mono, so that $(M,\bigoplus_{i \in I} A) \notin S$.

The next case would be to look at two cyclic modules, say $$M = A/I,~N = A/J$$ for two ideals $I,J$. Then $$M \otimes N^* \cong A/I \otimes \mathrm{Ann}(J) \cong \mathrm{Ann}(J)/(I \cdot \mathrm{Ann}(J))$$ and $$\hom(N,M) \cong \{[a] \in A/I : aJ \subseteq I\} = (I:J)/I.$$ The canonical map then identifies with $[a] \mapsto [a]$. This is clearly not a monomorphism in general, even for $I=J$ in which case we just get the map $$\mathrm{Ann}(I) \to A/I,~a \mapsto [a]$$ with kernel $I \cap \mathrm{Ann}(I)$. This kernel can be non-trivial: take $A = k[X]/\langle X^2 \rangle$ and $I = \langle X \rangle$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ If M is flat and N is finitely presented you get an isomorphism $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 21:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hmm, I guess this one won't make it on the too good to be true list like I hoped :) $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 22:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Just to note. For finitely generated modules over a Noetherian ring, Auslander and Bridger studied this map extensively and used the notion of the Auslander transpose to provide an explicit description of the kernel of this map. It can be described as $\operatorname{Tor}^A_2(\operatorname{Tr} N,M)$. See "Stable Module Theory" by Auslander-Bridger for this and many related results. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 9, 2023 at 7:00
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin Brandenburg: thanks for the answer. $\endgroup$
    – marco2013
    Commented Feb 10, 2023 at 5:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @marco2013 $\operatorname{Tr} N$ denotes the Auslander transpose of $N$. It can be defined by taking a projective presentation $P_1 \xrightarrow{B} P_0 \rightarrow N \rightarrow 0$ and setting $\operatorname{Tr} N:=\operatorname{coker} \operatorname{Hom}_A(B,A)$. It is only unique up to stable equivalence, but this is not an issue for its typical applications. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 10, 2023 at 17:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .