9
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $M$ is a compact, real algebraic subset of $\mathbb R^n$ and $f:\mathbb R^n \to \mathbb R^m$ is the projection to the first $m$ coordinates. If $f$ maps $M$ bijectively unto its image $f(M)$, is it true that $f(M)$ is algebraic?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Do such maps exist? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 14, 2022 at 9:22
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Dima Pasechnik: Yes, certainly. Take a circle in $\Bbb{R}^3$ and a general projection to $\Bbb{R}^2$. $\endgroup$
    – abx
    Commented Feb 14, 2022 at 12:55
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps even better, a slightly bent circle, not lying in a plane in $\mathbb{R}^3$ $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 14, 2022 at 13:14
  • $\begingroup$ @DimaPasechnik any subvariety of $\mathbb R^m$ gives rise to one. the question is that we know that the image is carved out by Zariski closed and open sets + algebraic inequalities. it would be best to know if injectivity implies the absence of inequalities (then the opens are ruled out by compactness). $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 14, 2022 at 13:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DimaPasechnik also if you have the configuration space of a certain mechanism in 3d (say the square pyramid with square base removed) and the configuration space of its sub-mechanism (quadrangle linkage bounding the base) then we find ourselves in the situation of my question (and in this example the image is indeed algebraic) $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 14, 2022 at 13:41

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

The answer is no. (Although the previous example I gave was bad.)

Let $C$ be the curve $y^2 = x^2 (x-1)(2-x)$, so $C$ has a smooth component with $1 \leq x \leq 2$, and also a node at $(0,0)$. Let $M$ be the normalization of $C$; explicitly, $$M = \{ (x,y,z) : z^2 = (x-1)(2-x),\ y=xz \}.$$ Then the projection $M \to C$ is $1$-to-$1$ over the smooth component but misses the node.


However, such examples can only miss a set of lower dimension than $M$, and cannot occur if all connected components of the Zariski closure of $f(M)$ have the same dimension! This follows from

Bialynicki-Birula, A.; Rosenlicht, M., Injective morphisms of real algebraic varieties, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 13, 200-203 (1962). ZBL0107.14602.

At the start of section 2, they prove the following result:

Let $V$ and $W$ be real algebraic sets and let $f: V \to W$ be an injective morphism such that $f(V)$ is Zarsiki-dense in $W$. Then $f(V)$ contains a Zariski-open Zariski-dense subset of $W$.

Note that this is very false for $f$ non-injective; consider the map $x \mapsto x^2$ from $\mathbb{R}$ to itself.

In our setting, take $V = M$ and let $W$ be the Zariski-closure of $f(M)$. For simplicity, let $M$ be irreducible, so $W$ will be as well.

Bialynicki-Birula and Rosenlicht's result shows that $f(M)$ must contain a Zariski-open Zariski-dense subset $U$ of $W$, and thus $W \setminus U$ must be a proper Zariski closed subset of $W$. In particular, $W \setminus U$ must have dimension lower than $\dim W = \dim M$. If we now assume that $W$ is irreducible and all its connected components have the same dimension, then $U$ must be dense in $M$ for the analytic topology.

But, also, $f(M)$ is closed in the analytic topology since $M$ is compact. We have shown that $f(M)$ is closed for the analytic topology and contains a dense set (namely $U$) for the analytic topology, so $f(M) = W$.

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .