Timeline for Grading a non-graded poset as squeezed as possible
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 30, 2018 at 17:58 | comment | added | darij grinberg | @jeq: Afraid I don't have it any longer. But it's just a computer-generated picture of the poset; anyone can reconstruct it if interested. | |
Jan 30, 2018 at 2:55 | comment | added | jeq | The link to the image seems to be broken. | |
Aug 14, 2012 at 13:01 | comment | added | Patricia Hersh | By the way, I deleted my answer since it was incorrect. Thanks again for the example that helped me see my mistake. | |
Jun 16, 2012 at 19:34 | comment | added | Patricia Hersh | Ok, thanks for drawing it. That's an interesting example. | |
Jun 16, 2012 at 16:32 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Yes, I have done already; I was just too lazy to draw it. (Sage's drawing routine broke the symmetry and made it useless.) | |
Jun 16, 2012 at 16:31 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 595 characters in body
|
Jun 16, 2012 at 14:34 | comment | added | Patricia Hersh | One more comment: I would suggest you take some time to digest your counterexample (if you haven't already) and add to your answer an explanation for what issue it reveals that is making your conjecture false. This will make it much easier for people to quickly understand the counterexample and perhaps give you further suggestions. | |
Jun 16, 2012 at 13:04 | comment | added | Patricia Hersh | I don't have time now to go through your counterexample, but good luck with this stuff. I tend to think something along these lines should be true, and it might be a matter of finding the right statement. | |
Jun 15, 2012 at 21:26 | vote | accept | darij grinberg | ||
Jun 15, 2012 at 21:26 | history | answered | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |