Skip to main content
added 4 characters in body
Source Link

Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. Assume that for any index set $I$, $\cap_{i \in I} K_i$ is not empty and is not properly contained in any body $K_i$ for $i\in I$.

Is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres?

Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. Assume that for any index set $I$, $\cap_{i \in I} K_i$ is not empty and is properly contained in any body $K_i$ for $i\in I$.

Is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres?

Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. Assume that for any index set $I$, $\cap_{i \in I} K_i$ is not empty and is not properly contained in any body $K_i$ for $i\in I$.

Is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres?

added 57 characters in body
Source Link

Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. Assume that for any index set $I$, $\cap_{i \in I} K_i$ is not empty and is properly contained in any body $K_i$ for $i\in I$.

Is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres?

Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. Assume that for any index set $I$, $\cap_{i \in I} K_i$ is not empty.

Is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres?

Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. Assume that for any index set $I$, $\cap_{i \in I} K_i$ is not empty and is properly contained in any body $K_i$ for $i\in I$.

Is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres?

deleted 53 characters in body; deleted 27 characters in body
Source Link

Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. (Assume some generality condition, soAssume that in particular, for anany index set $I$, $dim(\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i)=d-|I|$)$\cap_{i \in I} K_i$ is not empty.

Consider an index set $I$, isIs it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres?

Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. (Assume some generality condition, so that in particular, for an index set $I$, $dim(\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i)=d-|I|$).

Consider an index set $I$, is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres?

Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. Assume that for any index set $I$, $\cap_{i \in I} K_i$ is not empty.

Is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres?

edited title
Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading