Timeline for A Lebesgue measurable set which is not Borel measurable (Lusin) [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3 at 16:55 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | There is an argument based on cardinality that shows that such sets exist. If one says ONLY that because of cardinalities such a set exists, that appears non-constructive. But I suspect by looking at the arguments that show that the cardinalities of such-and-such sets are thus-and-so, one may be able to come closer to constructing an example. But this seems unlikely to qualify as "research-level" math. | |
| Oct 30, 2021 at 22:20 | history | edited | KConrad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Jun 13, 2012 at 15:41 | history | closed |
Zev Chonoles Andreas Blass Simon Thomas Mark Meckes George Lowther |
too localized | |
| Jun 13, 2012 at 15:41 | answer | added | Gerald Edgar | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 13, 2012 at 15:38 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | @Chandra: But that is not what he is asking for... | |
| Jun 13, 2012 at 15:09 | comment | added | C.S. | @jorge: Google search gives lot of good results. Here is one which I liked: unapologetic.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/… | |
| Jun 13, 2012 at 14:14 | comment | added | Zev Chonoles | MathOverflow is for research-level questions only, see the FAQ: mathoverflow.net/faq#whatnot. Here is a thread on Math Stack Exchange where this topic is addressed: math.stackexchange.com/q/141017/264 | |
| Jun 13, 2012 at 14:06 | history | asked | jorge vargas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |