Timeline for Generating the graded S_n-module associated to an operad
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2012 at 7:16 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | No worries :-) | |
| Jun 14, 2012 at 7:16 | answer | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jun 14, 2012 at 4:04 | comment | added | John Wiltshire-Gordon | @Vladimir Dotsenko Sorry I've been misspelling your name. | |
| Jun 14, 2012 at 3:58 | comment | added | John Wiltshire-Gordon | @Vladimir Dostenko Yes. | |
| Jun 14, 2012 at 3:19 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | In your new setup, do you assume characteristic zero? | |
| Jun 13, 2012 at 16:10 | comment | added | John Wiltshire-Gordon | @Vladimir Dostenko Good to know, thanks. I have added a smaller question which seems more likely to have an answer. | |
| Jun 13, 2012 at 16:09 | history | edited | John Wiltshire-Gordon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
limited scope of question to associative binary operads
|
| Jun 13, 2012 at 7:25 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | In this generality, nothing much better can be done, I think. If you are hoping for some suggestions, you might want to narrow things down a bit. | |
| Jun 13, 2012 at 4:06 | history | asked | John Wiltshire-Gordon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |