Timeline for Is this seemingly novel irrational constant also transcendental?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2019 at 18:28 | vote | accept | Stuart LaForge | ||
| Jun 8, 2012 at 16:43 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | I guess what I could have said to be more explicit is the theorem says low complexity implies rational or transcendental. Since rational was ruled out by the OP, we are left with transcendental. | |
| Jun 8, 2012 at 5:39 | comment | added | Harry Altman | Neat theorem! A nitpick: This assumes the number is irrational, as otherwise rational numbers would be a counterexample. | |
| Jun 7, 2012 at 15:49 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | PS: This would be just fine for any linear function of $n$. I'm not sure how this would work for anything else... | |
| Jun 7, 2012 at 15:48 | history | answered | Anthony Quas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |