Timeline for Notation for the all-ones vector
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2009 at 23:23 | comment | added | Bkkbrad | As much as I love the bold 1 notation, I think I will go with the bold e, since that appears popular in the papers I am citing. | |
| Dec 27, 2009 at 23:19 | vote | accept | Bkkbrad | ||
| Dec 27, 2009 at 22:26 | comment | added | Greg Kuperberg | My feeling is that each of the other notations could mean any number of different things. By contrast, it's hard to avoid the intended meaning of $\vec{1}$ when, in context, there is a distinguished basis. | |
| Dec 27, 2009 at 22:05 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | e and bolded e seem acceptable to me. They are good for the following reason: this notion only makes sense in light of a choice of basis and norm, and the notations using the letter e make it clear that this is only with respect to the basis $\{ e_i \}_{i\in I}$ | |
| Dec 27, 2009 at 21:49 | history | edited | Greg Kuperberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 9 characters in body
|
| Dec 27, 2009 at 21:34 | history | answered | Greg Kuperberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |