Timeline for Papers whose title defines a new terminology [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
37 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012 at 14:19 | vote | accept | Papiro | ||
| Jun 15, 2012 at 15:33 | vote | accept | Papiro | ||
| Jul 30, 2012 at 14:19 | |||||
| Jun 12, 2012 at 21:02 | vote | accept | Papiro | ||
| Jun 15, 2012 at 9:05 | |||||
| Jun 12, 2012 at 12:20 | comment | added | Papiro | @quid I am sorry if I make you feel uncomfortable. Thank you very much for your information about meta. | |
| Jun 12, 2012 at 4:59 | comment | added | Noam D. Elkies | I'm reminded of the title essay of Mermin's Boojums all the way through: communicating science in a prosaic age (admittedly his original boojum article was not a math paper, though the collection does include a short mathematical exposition or two). See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boojum_(superfluidity) . | |
| Jun 11, 2012 at 19:31 | comment | added | user9072 | Could you kindly stop the endless editing of this question. If you want to get it reopened and/or improved start a discussion on meta (you'd need to signup there too, but this is trivial and instant) | |
| Jun 11, 2012 at 19:21 | history | edited | Papiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 33 characters in body
|
| Jun 9, 2012 at 1:01 | comment | added | Lee Mosher | This cacophonous concoction evidently entailed tongues stubbornly stuck in cheeks, an achievement probably unrepeatable, of dubious distinction. So says he who opted for an opus entitled "A hyperbolic-by-hyperbolic hyperbolic group". | |
| Jun 8, 2012 at 17:25 | history | edited | Papiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2012 at 14:49 | history | edited | Papiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 327 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2012 at 14:14 | history | edited | Papiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 413 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2012 at 13:51 | vote | accept | Papiro | ||
| Jun 8, 2012 at 13:51 | |||||
| Jun 8, 2012 at 13:50 | history | edited | Papiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2012 at 0:19 | comment | added | Papiro | @Francois: The neologisms in the title should reflect the phenomenon analysed. Quefrency, e.g., is frequency changed by the echo effect in communication. Cepstrum is spectrum, and so on. The phenomenon analysed was used to creates its own new terminology. There is no joke, no colorful language. Thanks for your suggestions. | |
| Jun 7, 2012 at 0:03 | comment | added | Benjamin Steinberg | I like Grothendiecks Dessins d'enfants | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 23:34 | history | edited | Papiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 31 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jun 6, 2012 at 23:21 | comment | added | Francois Ziegler | @PaPiro: if I understand correctly, you are after papers with neologisms (not just "unusual words") in the title. What extra conditions you want these neologisms to satisfy isn't quite as clear, but mathematicians create language all the time. By restricting the scope enough you should be able to concoct a valid question on that general subject. | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 22:59 | history | edited | Papiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 225 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2012 at 22:52 | vote | accept | Papiro | ||
| Jun 6, 2012 at 22:58 | |||||
| Jun 6, 2012 at 20:04 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by François G. Dorais | ||
| Jun 6, 2012 at 20:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
insert duplicate link
|
|
| Jun 6, 2012 at 20:03 | history | closed |
Steven Gubkin Felipe Voloch Andy Putman Martin Brandenburg François G. Dorais |
exact duplicate | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 19:13 | comment | added | Papiro | @quid: I do not believe... but I want a very big huge list of answers. If so, CW. Thank you for your comments. | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 19:09 | comment | added | user9072 | @PaPiro: if you do not believe/want a list of answers, why did you tag it big-list in the first place?! In addition, the only way in which this question IMO can make any sense is if it is intended as collecting (all/many) such examples. As opposed to looking for an answer 'Yes, there are other such examples; this one other example "proves" this.' | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 19:01 | comment | added | Papiro | @David I do not believe in a large list of answers because the context is very restrictive. But... | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 18:58 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Ossters (Bogert et al). | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 18:40 | answer | added | Francois Ziegler | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 18:21 | answer | added | Francois Ziegler | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 16:16 | comment | added | Papiro | @Cohn, please, see "ADDED". Thank you for your comments. | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 16:09 | history | edited | Papiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 255 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2012 at 15:55 | comment | added | Henry Cohn | What counts as unusual terminology that has became widely accepted? For example, Sylvester introduced tons of unusual words into mathematics (totient, syzygy, etc.). Do those count, or are you just looking for word play like "cepstrum"? | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 15:43 | history | edited | Papiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 64 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2012 at 15:39 | comment | added | Steven Gubkin | Ah I see. So you are only interested in papers where the unusual terminology became widely accepted. By "this characteristic" I thought you meant just that the title was unusual. | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 15:35 | comment | added | Papiro | @Gubkin, thank you for your comments. IMHO, this is not a subquestion because there is no colorful language in this paper. The authors changed the position of the letters in the paper title to reflect the phenomenon analysed (echo in communication). This defines a whole vocabulary that they used to nominate the new signal processing technique. | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 15:09 | comment | added | Steven Gubkin | I feel this is a subquestion to mathoverflow.net/questions/22299/… and should be closed. | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 15:09 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | Mlibey . | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 14:56 | history | asked | Papiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |