Timeline for When (if ever) disclose your identity as a reviewer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2012 at 1:43 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | Perhaps I'm mistaken, but the impression I have is that the reason some birthday conference proceedings have such fantastic papers is not because the referees are asked to keep things at high standards, but instead because the authors want to submit very good papers to the proceedings to honor the focus of the proceedings. | |
| May 31, 2012 at 1:39 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | Certainly not! (and in many cases they have higher overall quality than the journal they are published in) However, in this particular case the editors expressly told me that they were only looking for correctness. | |
| May 31, 2012 at 0:56 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | @Karl: Are you saying that birthday conference proceedings papers need not be interesting? | |
| May 31, 2012 at 0:38 | history | answered | Karl Schwede | CC BY-SA 3.0 |