Timeline for Progress on Bouniakowsky's Conjecture
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2012 at 15:03 | comment | added | Kevin O'Bryant | @gerry: That's right, that's part of the "better" to which I referred. In the single polynomial situation, I think it is common to write "by Schinzel's Hyp. H, ...", while I'd never heard of Bouniakowsky's Conjecture before. | |
| May 31, 2012 at 14:40 | history | edited | Neil Strickland | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed wikipedia link
|
| May 31, 2012 at 7:10 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | Isn't H much more general than Bouniakowsky? Doesn't it deal with finite collections of polynomials, while Bouniakowsky just deals with a single polynomial? | |
| May 31, 2012 at 0:39 | comment | added | Joshua Seaton | I figured as much. Thank you, Kevin. | |
| May 31, 2012 at 0:39 | vote | accept | Joshua Seaton | ||
| May 30, 2012 at 23:42 | history | answered | Kevin O'Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |