Timeline for Are point sets of the same order type connected by continuous (order type)-preserving motion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2022 at 11:11 | history | edited | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
2 broken links fixed, cf. https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/34713/228959
|
| Mar 22, 2019 at 13:16 | comment | added | Nikolai Mnev | I wrote a special reply covering the question of @j.c. | |
| Mar 22, 2019 at 10:03 | comment | added | Nikolai Mnev | Suvorov’s example was in the framwork of activity around Hilbert 16-th problem. The lines configuration was considered as a singular real algebraic curve (obtained as a product of linear equations of the lines. So the term “rigid isotopy” originates in this point of view. | |
| Jul 18, 2017 at 10:38 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | @j.c.: Good question. I think the answer is Yes, but I am not certain. | |
| Jul 18, 2017 at 0:26 | comment | added | j.c. | The OP's question asks specifically about general position point sets -- is there still "universality" after restricting to those? | |
| Mar 17, 2017 at 22:46 | history | edited | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Image links broken; now fixed.
|
| May 29, 2012 at 23:56 | history | edited | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 98 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2012 at 21:35 | vote | accept | Nima Hoda | ||
| May 29, 2012 at 20:38 | history | edited | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2012 at 20:30 | history | edited | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 538 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2012 at 20:13 | history | answered | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |